Abstract

The last three decades have seen a significant advancement in describing and understanding the processes involved in second language (L2) writing (for recent reviews, see Cumming, 2016; Polio, 2012; Roca de Larios, Nicolas-Conesa, & Coyle, 2016). Much of the existing research has been cognitive in orientation and concerned with capturing the online behaviors of L2 writers (i.e., directly observable characteristics of the writing process such as pausing) and the cognitive operations that underlie L2 written production (e.g., planning, linguistic encoding). In the cognitive paradigm, the motivation for studying L2 writing processes comes from two main sources. First, research into L2 writing processes is important for theory-building purposes. When constructing and assessing theoretical models of L2 writing, it is not sufficient to look at the linguistic product of the composing process. To avoid the risk of construct underrepresentation (Norris & Ortega, 2003), it is also crucial to provide evidence about the behaviors of L2 writers and the cognitive activities underlying those behaviors. Second, it is believed that information about what L2 writers do when they compose a text can yield useful insights for L2 instruction and assessment. There is increasing evidence, for example, that understanding the processes in which good L2 writers engage may help identify what strategies may be beneficial to teach (e.g., Olson & Land, 2007; van Gelderen, Ootsdam, & van Schooten, 2011). Knowledge about how observable writing behaviors relate to underlying cognitive processes could also help diagnose sources of writing difficulty, and thereby enable educators to adjust instruction to better meet their students’ needs. Last but not least, research into L2 writing processes can also provide instructors with insights into the language learning potential of writing, that is, how the act of written production may foster cognitive processes, which are assumed to facilitate L2 development (Manchon & Roca de Larios, 2007a). In short, L2 writing process research may inform L2 instruction and assessment by advancing our understanding of both the learning-to-write and writing-to-learn dimensions of L2 writing (Manchon, 2011).

Highlights

  • Andrea Revesz* University College LondonMarije Michel University of Groningen and Lancaster UniversityThe last three decades have seen a significant advancement in describing and understanding the processes involved in second language (L2) writing

  • We intend to demonstrate how adopting new data-collection technologies and approaches to data analysis and combining these in innovative ways can generate new and more valid information about the L2 writing process and open up new avenues for research. This focus on methodological issues appears timely in the context of L2 writing research and against the backdrop of increasing interest in and growing awareness of methodological considerations in the larger field of L2 research (Marsden & Plonsky, 2018). This introduction provides a brief review of previous theoretical and related empirical work on L2 writing processes; discusses the potential of various methods, both more traditional and novel, to gain insights about the cognitive activities of L2 writers; and introduces the five empirical studies included in the special issue with a focus on their methodological contribution

  • A relatively new technique, a few L2 studies have already employed keystroke logging to examine the effects of proficiency (Barkaoui, 2016), task type (Barkaoui, 2016; Spelman-Miller, 2000), and task complexity (Revesz, Kourtali, & Mazgutova, 2017) on L2 writing behaviors; to compare the behaviors of L1 and L2 writers (Stevenson, Schoonen, & De Glopper, 2006; Thorson, 2000; Tillema, 2012; Van Waes & Leijten, 2015); and to assess longitudinal changes in L2 writing behaviors (Spelman Miller, Lindgren, & Sullivan, 2008)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Andrea Revesz* University College LondonMarije Michel University of Groningen and Lancaster UniversityThe last three decades have seen a significant advancement in describing and understanding the processes involved in second language (L2) writing (for recent reviews, see Cumming, 2016; Polio, 2012; Roca de Larios, Nicolas-Conesa, & Coyle, 2016). This introduction provides a brief review of previous theoretical and related empirical work on L2 writing processes; discusses the potential of various methods, both more traditional and novel, to gain insights about the cognitive activities of L2 writers; and introduces the five empirical studies included in the special issue with a focus on their methodological contribution.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call