Abstract

The idea for this supplement arose from discussions among a set of research partners associated with the Realising Rights Research Programme Consortium (RR RPC), an international partnership funded by the UK Department for International Development from 200510 that focused on neglected areas of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) [1]. In the Consortium, work on rights has been concerned with ways of bridging the gap between international legal human rights frameworks as applied to SRHR, and how these play out for actual people ‘on the ground’ .W e noted that there was a well-developed international language of human rights in relation to sexual and reproductive health, accompanied by significant international advocacy efforts stretching back several decades [2-4]. However, SRHR remained controversial and contested; sexual rights in particular are poorly understood by many policy actors, they are not easy to operationalise ‘downstream’ in policies and programmes, and their place and relevance in people’s day to day lives have been much less explored [5-7]. The papers in this volume are one contributi on to the task of laying out why it is important to fill this gap and what the analytical challenges are in doing so. We decided, therefore, to focus our thematic work on rights on the challenges of contextualising and operationalising the concept in different local and national domains. The aim was to start from the perspective of lived experience, rather than from an

Highlights

  • Hilary Standing1*, Kate Hawkins1, Elizabeth Mills1, Sally Theobald2, Chi-Chi Undie3. The idea for this supplement arose from discussions among a set of research partners associated with the Realising Rights Research Programme Consortium (RR RPC), an international partnership funded by the UK Department for International Development from 200510 that focused on neglected areas of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) [1]

  • In highlighting practical and epistemic entanglements that impinge on sexual and reproductive health rights, the papers shift the gaze from an exclusive focus on how groups and individuals negotiate rights in complex contexts, to the recognition that institutions themselves may inhibit the realisation of these rights

  • Submit your manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of:

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Hilary Standing1*, Kate Hawkins, Elizabeth Mills, Sally Theobald, Chi-Chi Undie. The idea for this supplement arose from discussions among a set of research partners associated with the Realising Rights Research Programme Consortium (RR RPC), an international partnership funded by the UK Department for International Development from 200510 that focused on neglected areas of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) [1]. They argue that the hostility to rights concepts encountered in many African contexts has its roots in strong community-based understandings of entitlements and responsibilities that are in tension with the perceived individualism of human rights discourses They draw upon anthropological research among the Ubang and Igbo groups in south-eastern Nigeria as well as on contemporary debates about sexual and reproductive health in the Africa region to unpack these tensions and consider ways of reconciling them [26]. In highlighting practical and epistemic entanglements that impinge on sexual and reproductive health rights, the papers shift the gaze from an exclusive focus on how groups and individuals negotiate rights in complex contexts, to the recognition that institutions themselves may inhibit the realisation of these rights In this way, the papers draw attention to the intersections of international policy, national institutions and the messy realities in which people live and negotiate their lives and their rights. List of abbreviations ICPD: International Conference on Population and Development; MPoA: Maputo Plan of Action; NGO: non-governmental organisation; RR RPC: Realising Rights Research Programme Consortium; SRH: Sexual and Reproductive Health; SRHR: Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights; TAC: Treatment Action Campaign

14. Hunt P
23. International Women’s Health Coalition: The Cairo Consensus
30. Siddiqi D
Findings
34. Kabeer N
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call