Abstract

Neuroimaging studies have revealed a multitude of brain regions associated with self- and other-referential processing, but the question how the distinction between self, close other, and distant other is processed in the brain still remains unanswered. The default mode network (DMN) is the primary network associated with the processing of self, whereas task-positive networks (TPN) are indispensable for the processing of external objects. We hypothesize that self- and close-other-processing would engage DMN more than TPN, whereas distant-other-processing would engage TPN to a greater extent. To test this hypothesis, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) functional connectivity data obtained in the course of a trait adjective judgment task while subjects evaluated themselves, the best friend, a neutral stranger, and an unpleasant person. A positive association between the degree of self-relatedness and the degree of DMN dominance was revealed in cortical midline structures (CMS) and the left lateral prefrontal cortex. Relative to TPN, DMN showed greater connectivity in me than in friend, in friend than in stranger, and in stranger than in unpleasant conditions. These results show that the less the evaluated person is perceived as self-related, the more the balance of activity in the brain shifts from the DMN to the TPN.

Highlights

  • The nature of self is one of the most controversial questions throughout the history of philosophy and science

  • The same data have been analyzed with regard to the effect of cultural values on default mode network (DMN) connectivity during self- and other-referential processing

  • Due to the quite different research question and analytical approach, these results could not be compared with the results of this study, where we tested the hypothesis that DMN-task-positive networks (TPN) balance during trait adjective judgment task depends on the degree of closeness of the evaluated person to the self

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The nature of self is one of the most controversial questions throughout the history of philosophy and science. ICNs in Self- and Other-Processing self is just an illusion of our perception (e.g., Hood, 2012) Despite these controversies, neuroscientific evidence reliably shows a set of brain regions, which are robustly associated with self-referential processing across functional domains (Northoff et al, 2006). Many studies show that self-processing is not limited to the CMS and includes many other brain regions, such as ventroand dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), temporal regions, temporoparietal cortex, insula, and a number of subcortical regions (Gazzaniga, 1998; Kircher et al, 2000; Damasio, 2003; Gallagher and Frith, 2003; Vogeley and Fink, 2003; Gillihan and Farah, 2005; Northoff et al, 2006; Morin and Michaud, 2007; Vanderwal et al, 2008)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call