Abstract
Abstract Background: This case report describes a young man with an intra-orbital foreign body (FB) in both eyes. Case Report: Intra-orbital FBs are rare, with few cases reported in the literature. This is because the orbit protects the globe from external forces, and the orbit is a closed cavity with one opening. This report details the case of a 28-year-old man who presented to the emergency unit with an 11-hour history of an intra-orbital FB. The patient was lying on a bench when a stationary motorcycle fell on him. He noticed that he was unable to open both eyes and was rushed to a peripheral hospital, then subsequently referred to this tertiary center. On examination, he was ill-looking and anxious but not febrile or pale. Systemic examination did not reveal any abnormality. Unaided visual acuity in the right eye (OD) was nil perception of light, while left eye visual acuity (OS) was counting fingers. The right eyelid was ptotic due to edema. He underwent basic laboratory investigations that were all normal. A plain X-ray revealed a radio-opaque FB penetrating the left orbit, fracturing the medial walls into the right orbit, with the round end positioned behind the right globe. The FB was identified as a broken part of a brake/clutch lever from the motorcycle. A computerized tomography scan showed a metallic object in both orbits, accompanied by pneumocephalus, and suggested transection of the right optic nerve. The patient was prepared for FB removal and repair of the lid penetration under general anesthesia, following review by the ENT surgeon and neurosurgeon. The brake lever was successfully removed, and the patient was administered antibiotics. Post-operatively, visual acuity in the right eye remained at nil perception of light, while that in the left eye improved to 6/9 upon discharge. Conclusion: There is no established protocol for managing intra-orbital FBs, as removal depends on factors such as the size, composition, and potential compression damage to structures around the globe, which could further compromise vision or function. Small inert objects may be left in place if removal would cause damage. However, in this case, removal was deemed necessary for several reasons.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
