Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Tumors: A Clinical Study and Management without the Aid of Nerve Monitoring

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Abstract Background: The incidence of primary spinal cord tumors is less and the true incidence is still not known and various studies are still being done. These tumors are benign and slow growing, and they generally present with pain – either radiculopathy or axial back pain or focal neurological deficits due to the loss of roots, myelopathy from spinal cord compression, or cauda equina symptoms due to chronic compression. Early diagnosis and operation are gratifying as the lesions are mostly benign and can be completely resected as well as preservation of functionality if operated as early as possible. Although rare, an inadvertent neurological injury during surgery is a concerning complication that can potentially be prevented with the assistance of intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM). This technology enables real-time assessment of spinal cord function by providing feedback from sensory tracts, motor tracts, and individual nerve roots. However, the definitive requirement for IONM in the treatment of a highly curable condition is still under consideration. Objective: our study aims at studying the clinical features of intradural extramedullary tumors and their operative management without nerve monitoring. Material and Methods: Patients with intradural extramedullary (IDEM) spinal cord tumors who fit the inclusion criteria and who were willing to investigations, surgical procedures, and follow up were enrolled in the study, and consent was obtained. Patient assessment was done clinically by McCormick’s Scale and radiologically by magnetic resonance imaging. Patients who underwent operation were followed up. The data was collected and analysed using SPSS software. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled in the study. The age group ranged from 6 years to 79 years. There were 13 females and 6 males in the study group. The common presenting complaints were backache and upper and lower limb pain. Nine out of the 19 patients underwent operative procedures after thorough radiological and clinical evaluation. Histopathology showed five cases of schwannoma and four cases of meningioma. The mean McCormick’s Scale preoperatively was 4.11, whereas postoperatively, it was 3.10. The operative procedures were performed without the aid of IONM, yet there were no inadvertent intraoperative injuries and postoperative outcomes were good. Our study data were comparable with other studies. Conclusion: IDEM tumors, though technically challenging to operate, have excellent results in terms of outcomes due to their benign characteristics as well as complete resectability. Therefore, it is essential to conduct a comprehensive examination and imaging for patients experiencing backaches and weakness. Following a careful evaluation, early surgical intervention should be considered, as the timeliness of the surgery contributes to enhanced outcomes. The unavailability of nerve monitoring did not portend any added risk of surgery if done meticulously though its aid would make the operative procedure safer and gross resection better.