Abstract

Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB), a pre-invasive neoplasm of the bile duct, is being established pathologically as a precursor lesion of invasive cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and at the time of surgical resection, approximately half of IPNBs show stromal invasion (IPNB associated with invasive carcinoma). IPNB can involve any part of the biliary tree. IPNB shows grossly visible, exophytic growth in a dilated bile duct lumen, with histologically villous/papillary neoplastic epithelia with tubular components covering fine fibrovascular stalks. Interestingly, IPNB can be classified into four subtypes (intestinal, gastric, pancreatobiliary and oncocytic), similar to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN). IPNBs are classified into low-grade and high-grade based on lining epithelial features. The new subclassification of IPNB into types 1 (low-grade dysplasia and high-grade dysplasia with regular architecture) and 2 (high-grade dysplasia with irregular architecture) proposed by the Japan–Korea pathologist group may be useful in the clinical field. The outcome of post-operative IPNBs is more favorable in type 1 than type 2. Recent genetic studies using next-generation sequencing have demonstrated the existence of several groups of mutations of genes: (i) IPNB showing mutations in KRAS, GNAS and RNF43 belonged to type 1, particularly the intestinal subtype, similar to the mutation patterns of IPMN; (ii) IPNB showing mutations in CTNNB1 and lacking mutations in KRAS, GNAS and RNF43 belonged to the pancreatobiliary subtype but differed from IPMN. IPNB showing mutation of TP53, SMAD4 and PIK3CA might reflect complicated and other features characterizing type 2. The recent recognition of IPNBs may facilitate further clinical and basic studies of CCA with respect to the pre-invasive and early invasive stages.

Highlights

  • The concept of epithelial tumors arising from non-invasive intraepithelial dysplasia or neoplasm is well-established in various human cancers [1]

  • intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) are classifiable into four subtypes by their epithelial cell lineages: intestinal subtype is the most common followed by gastric, pancreatobiliary and oncocytic subtypes

  • A novel subclassification of IPNB into types 1 and 2 is recently proposed: type 1 is composed of low-grade IPNB and high-grade IPNB with regular structures, and type 2 is composed of high-grade IPNB with irregular structures and constantly shows complicated lesions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The concept of epithelial tumors arising from non-invasive intraepithelial dysplasia or neoplasm is well-established in various human cancers [1]. IPNBs have been studied with reference to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN), as the biliary tree and pancreas are located closely anatomically, and at least some biliary diseases show similarities to pancreatic diseases [2,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Through these comparative studies, the main pathological characteristics of IPNB have been recognized, including the presence of four subtypes, slow progression with intraepithelial mucosal spreading around the main tumor and mucus hypersecretion.

Clinical Features
Epidemiology and Risks
Cross Sectional Imaging
Cholangiography
Cholangioscopy and Duodenoscopy
Location along the Biliary Tree
Pathologies of IPNBs
Intraductal Tumors
Bile Duct Dilatation
Mucin Hypersecretion
Classification Based on the Radio-Pathological Appearance
Two Tiered Grading
Invasion and Metastasis and Recurrence
Variants
IPNB Arising in Peribiliary Glands and Other Parts of the Liver
General Survey
Four Subtypes
IPNB with Intestinal Differentiation
IPNB with Non-Intestinal Differentiation
IPNB with Oncocytic Differentiation
Type 1 and 2 Subclassification
Similarities and Dissimilarities to IPMN
Different Backgrounds and Risks
Low- and High-Grade Dysplasia
Stromal Invasion and Occurrence of Complicated Lesions
Targettable Genes and Proteins in IPNB
Preoperative Diagnosis
Treatment
Non-Surgical Treatment
Post-Operative Outcomes and Influencing Factors
Gross Features
Anatomical Location
Invasion
Subtypes
Subclassification
Surgical Margin
Metastasis
Others
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call