Intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with BCG immunotherapy is more effective than intra-arterial chemotherapy plus intravesical chemotherapy or standard BCG immunotherapy in preventing the recurrence and progression of high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Abstract

BackgroundUp to 45% of patients with high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) will not benefit from adjuvant intravesical instillation. We aimed to introduce intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) to existing intravesical treatment and evaluate its feasibility and safety. Materials and methodsWe collected data from 170 patients who had been diagnosed with high-risk NMIBC and underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) over the last 5 years. Twenty-seven patients were excluded according to specific exclusion criteria. The remaining 143 patients were divided into 3 groups according to their treatment: intravesical instillation of Bacillus Calmette – Guerin (BCG), BCG+ intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC), and intravesical chemotherapy (IVC)+IAC groups. All groups received standard intravesical instillation of BCG or chemotherapeutic agents. In contrast, both the BCG+IAC and IVC+IAC groups received four courses of IAC (injection of cisplatin [60 mg/m2] and epirubicin [50 mg/m2] in the internal iliac arteries via Seldinger's percutaneous technique). ResultsThe median follow-up time was 47 months, ranging from 20 to 60 months. The restricted mean survival time (RMST), which represents the recurrence and progression rate of the BCG+IAC group, differed significantly when compared with the BCG group (P = 0.029 and 0.004, respectively) and the IVC+IAC group (P = 0.004 and 0.006, respectively). Kaplan-Meier plots revealed that the recurrence and progression-free survival of the BCG+IAC group were significantly higher than the BCG and IVC+IAC groups (P = 0.033 and 0.028, respectively). In contrast, the BCG and IVC+IAC groups showed similar RMST (P = 0.156 and 0.935, respectively), recurrence (P = 0.627), and progression-free (P = 0.931) survival. A small proportion of patients (20%) suffered from the adverse effects of IAC while 65% suffered from adverse reactions to intravesical instillation. Most adverse effects were ranked as grade I or II according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. ConclusionAnalysis showed that tumor recurrence and progression rate in the BCG+IAC group was lower than the BCG and IVC+IAC groups while patients in the IVC+IAC group suffered from milder adverse effects in cystitis and flu-like symptoms. Our findings may provide a new perspective for urologists when treating patients with high-risk NMIBC.