Abstract

Objective: Elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is associated with organ dysfunction in critically ill children. Thus far, the predictive value of IAP for mortality remains unknown. Moreover, only few studies determined normal IAP values in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) children. This study aimed to determine the predictive value of IAP for mortality and calculate normal IAP values in PICU patients.Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in two PICUs of two tertiary care university teaching hospitals. Patients admitted to the PICU between December 2013 and November 2015 were included. IAP was determined by bladder pressure measurements performed every 8 h until 48 h or until PICU discharge. All patients (except neonatal patients) aged ≤ 14 years who were admitted to the PICUs and had no history of chemical neuromuscular blockade use, neurogenic bladder, or bladder surgery were enrolled. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the predictive value of IAP for 28-day mortality. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to evaluate the prediction effect of IAP.Results: Overall, 229 patients were enrolled. IAP (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.029–1.161, P = 0.004) and lactic acid (hazard ratio 3.04, 95% CI 1.769–5.21, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of 28-day mortality. Additionally, IAP had good predictive power for 28-day mortality, with an area under the curve of 0.74. The optimal cutoff point was 12.13 mmHg (sensitivity 0.58, specificity 0.80). The Youden index was 0.38.Furthermore, 111 (48.47%) patients without high-risk factors or clinical manifestations of IAH were analyzed to determine normal IAP values, which were 7.57 ± 2.85 mmHg (range, 1.98–13.16 mmHg). There were no significant differences in normal IAP values according to different diseases, sex, age, weight, or body mass index (BMI).Conclusions: IAP has good predictive power for 28-day mortality. The optimal IAP cutoff point is 12.13 mmHg. The IAP reference range is 2.0–13.2 mmHg, which was not associated with factors such as sex, age, weight, and BMI in PICU children. We recommend that IAP be included in critical illness scoring systems in the future. IAP >12.13 mmHg may be more suitable for IAH definition in PICU patients.

Highlights

  • Elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) can lead to intraabdominal hypertension (IAH), which is associated with dysfunction of the cerebrum and the digestive, respiratory, cardiovascular, and renal systems

  • According to the updated World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS) guidelines [9], the normal IAP value in a critically ill child was 4–10 mmHg; IAH was defined as a sustained IAP elevation of >10 mmHg; the guidelines are based on data collected from a single-center study of children who were put on mechanical ventilation (MV) [7]

  • 229 critically ill children were enrolled in the study, and the mortality predictive value was determined in these patients; 111 of the 229 patients did not have high-risk factors (Supplementary Table 1) or clinical manifestations of IAH [9], and the normal IAP values were determined in these patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) can lead to intraabdominal hypertension (IAH), which is associated with dysfunction of the cerebrum and the digestive, respiratory, cardiovascular, and renal systems. It is unclear whether normal values of IAP in children not receiving MV are consistent with those in children receiving MV and whether such normal values of IAP defined by the WSACS guidelines are applicable to children without MV support Physiological variables such as old age and increased body mass index (BMI) have been reported as risk factors for IAH in adults [14,15,16]. The study conducted by Ejike et al examined normal IAP values in different weight groups; they did not analyze the effects of other physiological parameters such as age, sex, or BMI. It is unknown whether these physiological parameters affect the normal values of IAP in children

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call