Abstract
In group-living mammals, individual efforts to maximize reproductive success result in conflicts and compromises between the sexes. Females utilize counterstrategies to minimize the costs of sexual coercion by males, but few studies have examined the effect of such behaviors on female reproductive success. Secondary dispersal by females is rare among group-living mammals, but in western gorillas, it is believed to be a mate choice strategy to minimize infanticide risk and infant mortality. Previous research suggested that females choose males that are good protectors. However, how much female reproductive success varies depending on male competitive ability and whether female secondary dispersal leads to reproductive costs or benefits has not been examined. We used data on 100 females and 229 infants in 36 breeding groups from a 20-year long-term study of wild western lowland gorillas to investigate whether male tenure duration and female transfer rate had an effect on interbirth interval, female birth rates, and offspring mortality. We found that offspring mortality was higher near the end of males’ tenures, even after excluding potential infanticide when those males died, suggesting that females suffer a reproductive cost by being with males nearing the end of their tenures. Females experience a delay in breeding when they dispersed, having a notable effect on birth rates of surviving offspring per female if females transfer multiple times in their lives. This study exemplifies that female counterstrategies to mitigate the effects of male-male competition and sexual coercion may not be sufficient to overcome the negative consequences of male behavior.SignificanceIndividual reproductive success is maximized through conflicts and compromises between the sexes in social mammals. In species with high dimorphism, females can experience sexual coercion by males and develop counterstrategies to reduce these costs. We studied this link in western lowland gorillas, which exhibit female secondary dispersal, a strategy that is believed to reflect female choice for the protective abilities of males. We found that females are faced with the dilemma of staying with a silverback at the end of his tenure and risk higher infant mortality versus dispersing and suffering reproductive delays and lower birth rates. This study shows that female reproductive strategies, namely dispersal, used to counter the effects of sexual coercion by males are not sufficient to overcome the negative consequences of male behavior.
Highlights
Social structures of group-living species are a result of male and female reproductive strategies (Kappeler and van Schaik 2002; Clutton-Brock 2007; Palombit 2015)
In species with high dimorphism, females can experience sexual coercion by males and develop counterstrategies to reduce these costs. We studied this link in western lowland gorillas, which exhibit female secondary dispersal, a strategy that is believed to reflect female choice for the protective abilities of males
We examined the reproductive success of female western gorillas using three variables: the survival probability of their offspring through infancy, the duration of their interbirth intervals (IBI), and the birth rate of surviving offspring (Robbins et al 2007; Pusey 2012)
Summary
Social structures of group-living species are a result of male and female reproductive strategies (Kappeler and van Schaik 2002; Clutton-Brock 2007; Palombit 2015). Females develop counterstrategies against male coercion and may seek out males that offer protection from conspecifics or predators (Breuer et al 2009). These divergent reproductive strategies often result in pronounced sexual conflicts (Trivers 1972; Arnqvist and Rowe 2013; Palombit 2015). Infanticide risk by immigrant males during group takeovers can be reduced if females actively disperse to voluntarily join other males during the limited time window between weaning of their last offspring and before conceiving again (Sterck et al 2005; Robbins 2009). Female dispersal may be an effective counterstrategy to infanticide and may reduce the benefits of males attempting a takeover as males are less likely to risk injury by challenging a dominant male only to find that all females leave for another male (Steenbeek 2000; Janson et al 2012)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.