Abstract

Evaluating the factors influencing the patterns of female dispersal in mammals is critical to understanding its importance for male and female reproductive strategies and the evolution of social systems. In western lowland gorillas, females emigrate from their natal group (natal dispersal) but also disperse between groups multiple times in their life (secondary dispersal). This strategy is uncommon in primates and may reflect females seeking to reduce feeding competition or female choice for males that can provide protection against infanticide. In this study, we test how inbreeding avoidance, group size, and male competitive ability could influence female dispersal in western gorillas, using 25 natal and 285 secondary dispersal events collected over 20 years at Mbeli Bai. We found that while all females dispersed out of their natal group, presumably to avoid inbreeding, females also left their group before having their first offspring when the dominant male was not their father, pointing towards unconditional dispersal by nulliparous females. Regarding secondary dispersal, we found that females were more likely to stay with males that were at the beginning of their tenure than transfer and more likely to disperse away from (presumably old) males that were near the end of their tenure or closer to their death. Females were also more likely to leave larger groups for smaller ones suggesting a potential effect of within-group feeding competition or avoidance of outsider males or predators. This study highlights the intersexual conflict found in gorillas: while female choice for high-quality males may influence the formation of their relatively rare social system, smaller group size may be more important for females than previously thought, which runs counter to the males’ interest of having a high number of females.SignificanceDispersal is a very important life strategy for most group-living mammals. Secondary dispersal by females is a rare behavior but is believed to be a counterstrategy against sexual coercion by males, reduces feeding competition, assists in predator avoidance, and facilitates mate choice. We studied the factors influencing secondary dispersal in western lowland gorillas. We found that the duration of male tenure and the size of the group influences female transfer decisions. This study shows that female reproductive strategies such as secondary dispersal may be very powerful to counter the risk of infanticide through female choice for better protector males but also to reduce the impact of feeding competition or to avoid predators or outsider males.

Highlights

  • Dispersal has profound consequences for gene flow, the evolution of social group patterns, and the geographic distributions of animals (Clobert et al 2012)

  • These results suggest that secondary dispersal is influenced by a combined pressure of reducing group size, which may reflect lower intra-group feeding competition and/or deflecting attention from outsider males or predators, and residing with males having high competitive ability

  • Our results suggest that both group size and male competitive ability play a role, it is difficult to disentangle the effects of each factor

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dispersal has profound consequences for gene flow, the evolution of social group patterns, and the geographic distributions of animals (Clobert et al 2012). To determine if and when to transfer, a female may gather information on other social groups and evaluate the costs and benefits of such a decision (Isbell and Van Vuren 1996; Clobert et al 2009). Females may disperse from their natal groups to avoid inbreeding, especially if their father may still be in the group (Ims and Hjermann 2001; Clutton-Brock and Lukas 2012). Any subsequent “secondary” dispersal is often attributed to socioecological factors (Isbell and Van Vuren 1996; Clutton-Brock and Lukas 2012). Females may leave larger groups and join smaller groups to avoid feeding competition and intrasexual competition within groups, or reduced attraction by outsider males or predators (Hill and Lee 1998; CluttonBrock and Lukas 2012). Larger groups may provide better protection against predators due to increased

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call