Abstract
This paper examines the discourse function of interrogative utterances in legislative interactional discourse (LID). Texts of legislative sessions of the Lagos and Ogun State Houses of Assembly in Nigeria were purposively sampled and analysed using insights from speech acts, conversation analysis and systemic functional linguistics. The analysis reveals that interrogatives in legislative interactional discourse serve two broad discursive purposes of elicitation and directive which enhance propositional development and coherence. Categories of interrogative utterances with elicitation function include elicit-inform, elicit-clarify, elicit-confirm, elicit-agree and elicit-permit. Interrogative directive utterances deployed almost exclusively by the Speaker serve as a turn allocation cue prompting other legislators’ verbal or action response. It is further revealed that, structurally, these directives are expressed as one of the forms May + request, wh-clauses and subject-operator invertednominal phrases. When skilfully deployed by legislators, these interrogative utterances enhance interactional success and improve the process and product of law making and governance in Nigeria.
Highlights
Discourse practices within the legislature have come under the scrutiny of discourse analysts in recent times
This paper examines the discourse function of interrogative utterances in legislative interactional discourse (LID)
The analysis reveals that interrogatives in legislative interactional discourse serve two broad discursive purposes of elicitation and directive which enhance propositional development and coherence
Summary
Discourse practices within the legislature have come under the scrutiny of discourse analysts in recent times While some of these studies have examined discourse markers (Ayoola, 2008), argumentation structures Ilie, 2000), and discursive structure of interruptions (Carbo, 1992), others have taken a more critical discourse approach focusing on issues of contextualization (e.g. Van Dijk, 2003, 2004) and ideology (e.g. Van Dijk, 2000; Steiner, 2004). In addition to these studies, Chilton (2004) examined the nature of questioning in parliamentary discourse. A study of how interrogative utterances are used in legislative discourse is capable of demonstrating propositional coherence and the interactive frames of agreement and disagreement in deliberative politics which can be developed as a tool for law making and governance in Nigeria
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
