Interpreting change on the Child Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition

Abstract

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to examine the one-year test-retest reliability of Child Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition component scores and provide recommendations for interpreting change on its component tests. DesignA prospective cohort study was conducted across two years via the Advancing Healthcare Initiatives for Underserved Students (ACHIEVES) Project. MethodsParticipants were 219 children (ages 11 to 12, M = 11.7, SD = 0.5; 52.1% girls, 47.9% boys) playing competitive school-sponsored sports in nine middle schools across a large public-school division in Virginia, USA during the 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 academic years. Athletic Trainers administered the baseline Child Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition each year. ResultsTest-retest reliability estimates for each Child Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition component were low to moderate (ICCs=0.40-0.55). A minority of middle school athletes (15-31%) scored within a different normative classification range upon re-assessment. The following test-retest difference scores occurred in 20% or fewer of the sample: +5 total symptoms, +7 symptom severity, -2 in the Standardized Assessment of Concussion - Child Version total score, and +4 total Modified Balance Error Scoring System balance errors. ConclusionsChild Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition component scores had poor to moderate test-retest reliability coefficients over a one-year period, though most children were classified as falling within the same interpretive category upon re-testing based on local norms. We report the raw score changes that were uncommon in our sample of uninjured children to help clinicians identify changes that might be clinically meaningful.