Interpretation of uniaxial, confined compression test data for agricultural topsoils

Abstract

Traditionally, soil strength is estimated from uniaxial, confined compression tests by procedures adopted from classical soil mechanics. The heterogeneity of agricultural topsoil calls for an alternative approach. Undisturbed soil cores were collected in the plough layer of 14 soils in arable agriculture. Soil texture ranged from coarse sandy to silty loam soils with a maximum of 20% clay. The samples were drained to either of six matric potentials in the range from − 30 to − 300 hPa. Uniaxial, confined compression was applied to ∼800 kPa with strain-controlled stress application (1 mm min−1). Measured strain was fitted to stress by the Morgan-Mercer-Flodin (MMF) model. The model fitted data remarkably well for all samples. Three fitting parameters of the model reflected physical characteristics of soil reaction to stress. The estimates of soil compressibility calculated from the model at 10 kPa (C10) correlated closely and linearly to the Cs index considered to reflect elastic deformation in classical studies of soil compression tests. Soil bulk density and content of soil organic matter decreased C10 as well as compressibility at 100 (C100) and 400 kPa (C400). A complex pattern in the effects of soil texture and soil moisture on compressibility was revealed. The pattern in strain-stress data is interpreted as a reflection of a gradual transition from elastic to plastic deformation of the mixture of structural units. The MMF model is suggested for interpretation of strain-stress data from uniaxial, confined compression tests. This implies use of stress in a linear scale.