Interpretation of deformation fabrics of infrastructure zone rocks in the context of channel flow and other tectonic models

Abstract

Abstract Infrastructure zones are essentially horizontal to shallowly dipping crustal-scale zones of non-coaxial flow, with two possible interpretations: (a) a crustal-scale shear zone, transporting upper crust over lower crust and/or mantle (transport flow); or (b) a zone of channel flow in which there is a flux of weak crust between relatively strong upper and lower crust and/or mantle, away from the centre of the orogen. Transport flow has a constant shear sense across the zone, whereas in channel flow the sense of shear reverses across the zone. Channel flow may be driven by extrusion (extrusive channel flow), due to the two channel walls approaching one another, or by a pressure gradient along the channel (normal channel flow), with no convergence of the walls necessary. Arguments based on strain compatibility and mechanics suggest that extrusive channel flow is unlikely. Kinematic vorticity numbers have been used to show that infrastructure and other shear zones have undergone flattening strains, but we show that the numbers are incompatible with extrusion. We also show that in addition to the problems inherent in determining kinematic vorticity numbers from fabric, the numbers cannot be related to bulk flow in mechanically heterogeneous zones, because of flow partitioning. Drag folds are a better indication, albeit qualitative, of whether a zone is thinning or not. They also give a conservative estimate of the minimum accumulated shear strains, and may inhibit strain localization. Like snowball garnets, they indicate shear strains that are so large that the pure-shear-thinning component for a steady-shear zone has to be small.