Abstract
Two different methods of quantifying asbestos fibre burden were assessed and the counts obtained were compared with semi-quantitative asbestos body counts in corresponding tissue sections. Comparison of the two methods found significantly different asbestos fibre counts between specimens. Each technique showed wide limits of agreement for reproducibility and interobserver variability as assessed by Bland-Altman plots, such that a repeated count could not necessarily be expected to lie within the same exposure category. Asbestos body counts in tissue sections were reproducible with good correlation between observers. Asbestos body and asbestos fibre counts showed correlation in some samples but not others. Counting of asbestos bodies is a valuable screening technique as the finding of asbestos bodies is accepted as a marker of significant asbestos exposure. When no asbestos bodies are identified asbestos fibres estimations may be useful in proving asbestos exposure. Different techniques are not interchangeable and each laboratory should establish a background range from unexposed individuals.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
