Abstract
'Islamic State of Iraq and Syria' (ISIS) has occupied parts of internationally recognized states and exerts further territorial pretensions. ISIS, also, implements a repressive rule, through violations of human rights and humanitarian law, which may constitute international crimes. In facing the threat od ISIS, the perception of international terrorism is important since this group has the features of a territorial entity. So far, facing with the threat of ISIS has been reduced to a model that is adopted by the UN Security Council against the terrorist network Al-Qaida. An international coalition of states, led by the United States, has undertaken air strikes on positions ISIS, on several grounds: the responsibility to protect, the protection of national security, and at the request of Iraq. At the same time, the strikes are applied in Syria, which can not be accountable for the actions of ISIS and has not requested international assistance. International law does not allow actions which would aim to destroy or jeopardize the territorial integrity or political independence of any sovereign and independent state, which is acting in accordance with the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and is hence governed by a representative government. The UNSC resolution 2249 remains short of recommending international armed action under the aegis of UNSC, but represents a step forward in recognizing the responsibility of this body in facing ISIS, at least as far as the 'destruction of refuge' is concerned. The use of force in the territory of Syria, without the express authorization of the UNSC is illegal, because terrorism does not constitute grounds for the use of force against countries. But, it opens broader issues of responsibility for the development of ISIS and the humanitarian crisis in the Middle East, as well as the functioning of the system of collective security. Overcoming the current crisis UNSC implies not just a mechanism for effective implementation of previous, unarmed, measures, but also reaching consensus on the functioning of the collective security system, because if there is no protection of states and citizens from violence, the question arises of the reasons for the existence of the system itself.
Highlights
U novembru 2015. godine, Savet bezbednosti UN je u rezoluciji usvojenoj na predlog Francuske „utvrdio” da „Islamska država u Iraku i Levantu” (ISIL, sinonim za ISIS), Al Nusra i pojedinci, grupe, poduhvati i entiteti povezani sa Al Kaidom predstavljaju pretnju za mir i bezbednost i pozvao države članice UN da protiv ove grupacije primene sve mere da spreče terorizam, uključujući uništavanje utočišta u Iraku i Siriji i prekidanje dotoka terorista i finansija, „uz pridržavanje međunarodnog prava, a posebno Povelje Ujedinjenih nacija”
A., Khan, B., 2014, Airstrikes on Isis targets in Syria and Iraq are legal under international law, LSE British Politics and Policy
It opens broader issues of responsibility for the development of ISIS and the humanitarian crisis in the Middle East, as well as the functioning of the system of collective security
Summary
Apstrakt: Cilj članka je analiza funkcionisanja sistema kolektivne bezbednosti na primeru oružane akcije koalicije protiv „Islamske države u Iraku i Siriji” (ISIS). Godine, Savet bezbednosti UN je u rezoluciji usvojenoj na predlog Francuske „utvrdio” da „Islamska država u Iraku i Levantu” (ISIL, sinonim za ISIS), Al Nusra i pojedinci, grupe, poduhvati i entiteti povezani sa Al Kaidom predstavljaju pretnju za mir i bezbednost i pozvao države članice UN da protiv ove grupacije primene sve mere da spreče terorizam, uključujući uništavanje utočišta u Iraku i Siriji i prekidanje dotoka terorista i finansija, „uz pridržavanje međunarodnog prava, a posebno Povelje Ujedinjenih nacija”.48. Treći komitet Generalne skupštine je, nakon uključivanja Rusije na poziv sirijske vlade za pomoć u borbi protiv terorizma, usvojio rezoluciju koju je takođe izradila Saudijska Arabija, u kojoj se osuđuju kršenja ljudskih prava od strane sirijskih vlasti, ISIS-a i „umerene opozicije”, kao i korišćenje hemijskih otrova i izrazio žaljenje što u SBUN nije usvojen nacrt rezolucije o situaciji u Siriji iz maja 2014. Tim novcem je raspolagala Koaliciona privremena vlast (KPV), čiji je civilni šef bio američki diplomata Pol
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
