Abstract
The historical aspects of the judgment International Court of Justice are controverted. Its lack of knowledge about Bolivian effective linkage with the sea is demonstrated. Also, the historic context assumed by the Court did not consider that Bolivia acted repeatedly in bad faith. This State did not accomplish and even openly broke three successive treaties signed with Chile in 1866, 1874 and 1884. On the next phase of this case this historic background should be considered and incorporated on the Counter-memorial.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
