Abstract

To investigate the performance, such as energy dependence and sensitivity, of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD), metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor dosimeters (MOSFET), and GafChromic™ films, and to validate the estimates of local dose deposition of a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation for breast dosimetry applications. Experimental measurements were performed using a monoenergetic beam at the ELETTRA synchrotron radiation light source (Trieste, Italy). The three types of dosimeters were irradiated in a plane transversal to the beam axis and calibrated in terms of air kerma. The sensitivity of MOSFET dosimeters and GafChromic™ films was evaluated in the range of 18-28 keV. Three different calibration curves for the GafChromic™ films were tested (logarithmic, rational, and exponential functions) to evaluate the best-fit curve in the dose range of 1-20 mGy. Internal phantom dose measurements were performed at 20 keV for four different depths (range 0-3 cm, with 1 cm steps) using a homogeneous 50% glandular breast phantom. A GEANT4 MC simulation was modified to match the experimental setup. Thirty sensitive volumes, on the axial-phantom plane were included at each depth in the simulation to characterize the internal dose variation and compare it to the experimental TLD and MOSFET measurements. Experimental 2D dose maps were obtained with the GafChromic™ films and compared to the simulated 2D dose distributions estimated with the MC simulations. The sensitivity of the MOSFET dosimeters and GafChromic™ films increased with x-ray energy, by up to 37% and 48%, respectively. Dose-response curves for the GafChromic™ film result in an uncertainty lower than 5% above 6 mGy, when a logarithmic relationship is used in the dose range of 1-10 mGy. All experimental values fall within the experimental uncertainty and a good agreement (within 5%) is found against the MC simulation. The dose decreased with increasing phantom depth, with the reduction being ~80% after 3 cm. The uncertainty of the empirical measurements makes the experimental values compatible with a flat behavior across the phantom slab for all the investigated depths, while the MC points to a dose profile with a maximum toward the center of the phantom. The calibration procedures and the experimental methodologies proposed lead to good accuracy for internal breast dose estimation. In addition, these procedures can be successfully applied to validate MC codes for breast dosimetry at the local dose level. The agreement among the experimental and MC results not only shows the correctness of the empirical procedures used but also of the simulation parameters.

Highlights

  • Mammography is currently the reference technology for early detection of breast cancer

  • The current dose metric used in mammography is the mean glandular dose (MGD).[1]

  • The logarithmic function [Fig. 4(a)] gives a total uncertainty of less than 5% above 6 mGy air kerma, while the total uncertainty for the rational and exponential functions increases with increasing air kerma, due to the higher fit error on the parameters b and m, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mammography is currently the reference technology for early detection of breast cancer. Millions of women undergo mammography examinations every year for both early detection (i.e., screening) and diagnosis. Due to the use of mammography as a screening technique, characterization and optimization of the radiation dose delivered is extremely important. The current dose metric used in mammography is the mean glandular dose (MGD).[1] a direct measurement of MGD is not feasible. Recent studies have shown that current breast dosimetry models tend to overestimate patient breast dose due to the uniform homogeneous approximation of the internal adipose/ glandular breast tissue mixture.[4,5,6] it is expected that a new breast model for dosimetry could involve a nonuniform and/or nonhomogeneous tissue description.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.