Intermodel disagreement of myocardial blood flow estimation from dynamic CT perfusion imaging

Abstract

PurposeTo assess the intermodel agreement of different tracer kinetic models to determine myocardial blood flow (MBF) and their diagnostic accuracy in coronary artery disease (CAD) at dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CTMPI). MethodsThree porcine hearts perfused in Langendorff mode and 15 patients with suspected CAD and perfusion single photon emission CT (SPECT) were included. Dynamic CTMPI was performed in shuttle-mode (70 kVp, 350mAs/rot) on 3rd generation dual-source CT. In porcine hearts and patients, myocardial segments (AHA-16-segment model) were drawn. Tissue attenuation curves were constructed per segment and arterial input functions were derived from the aorta. True MBF was calculated with input flow and weight of the porcine hearts. In patients, ischemic segments were based on SPECT results. MBF quantification was performed using the VPCT-software, Upslope, Extended Toft (ET), Two-compartment (TC) and Fermi models. ResultsIn porcine hearts, true MBF was 1.88 (interquartile range [IQR]:1.80-2.80)mL/g/min. Diagnostic accuracy was similar for all models: 0.96, 0.99, 0.92, 0.93 and 0.96 for VPCT software, Upslope method, Fermi, ET and TC model. The VPCT software and Upslope method resulted in lower MBF (median 1.44 [1.29–1.58] and 1.39 [1.25–1.59]mL/g/min) compared to the Fermi, ET, and TC model (median values of 1.76 mL/g/min [1.36–2.44], 2.55 mL/g/min [2.20–2.92], and 1.98 mL/g/min [1.60–2.60], respectively [p < 0.001]). In patients, all models showed a significant difference in MBF between the 34 ischemic and 206 non-ischemic segments (p-value<0.001). ConclusionAbsolute MBF values are significantly different between the models and a uniform threshold could not be determined; however, diagnostic accuracy for detecting ischemia is similar.