Abstract
Evaluating the rate of torque development (RTD) in isometric ballistic contraction targeting submaximal torques is usually overlooked in the literature. In a series of isometric ballistic contractions targeting a range of submaximal torque values, there is a linear relationship between the peak torque and the peak RTD obtained in each contraction. RTD scaling factor (RTD-SF) represents the slope of this relationship. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of interlimb asymmetry in the RTD-SF and in the RTD calculated across submaximal torques. Furthermore, we compared these asymmetry indices with those calculated adopting more classical approaches, such as ballistic contraction targeting maximal torque and isokinetic concentric conditions. Quadriceps and hamstrings strength was evaluated in both limbs of elite under 17 and under 19 soccer players (20 males, 17 ± 1 years). Participants performed three concentric isokinetic contractions at 240°/s and a series of isometric ballistic contractions targeting from 20 to 100% of maximal isometric torque. The interlimb difference was calculated for each parameter and players presenting an interlimb difference >15% were identified. A total of 40% (for quadriceps) and 60% (for hamstring) of players showed an interlimb asymmetry in isometric RTD for at least 50% of submaximal torque range. The RTD-SF was able to identify more players with asymmetry than the classical isokinetic tests. However, isokinetic and isometric indices of asymmetry were in general poorly or not correlated with each other. Most players presented an interlimb asymmetry in RTD for a wide part of the torque range and the adopted protocol was able to highlight important interindividual differences. Furthermore, players showed a large prevalence of RTD-SF asymmetry in both quadriceps and hamstrings. It is still to be determined if these asymmetries are functionally relevant. Nevertheless, the adopted protocol provided meaningful information for identifying interlimb asymmetries that could not be gathered when adopting the classical method of ballistic contractions targeting only maximal torques.
Highlights
The prevalence of interlimb asymmetries, referred to as bilateral muscle strength asymmetry, has been reported in numerous studies across a wide range of sports
We found that: (1) most players showed and interlimb asymmetry in rate of torque development (RTD) across a large part of submaximal torques, when targeting maximal torque; (2) there was a large prevalence of RTD scaling factor (RTD-SF) asymmetry in both quadriceps and hamstrings; (3) the prevalence of asymmetry was larger for RTD-SF than for the other indices of asymmetry, e.g., the isokinetic test
While an imbalance in RTDmax might be functionally relevant in many occasions, we argue that it would be important to measure possible interlimb asymmetry in ballistic contractions targeting submaximal, rather than maximal, torque levels
Summary
The prevalence of interlimb asymmetries, referred to as bilateral muscle strength asymmetry, has been reported in numerous studies across a wide range of sports. Using a cut-off of 15% as asymmetry criterion between lower limbs, Fousekis et al (2010b) found that professional soccer players presented quadriceps or hamstring strength asymmetries (65 and 45%, respectively). Up to 56% subjects among young elite and professional soccer players presented interlimb asymmetry in quadriceps and hamstrings (Lehance et al, 2009). Other studies (Zakas, 2006; Ruas et al, 2015) did not find muscle strength asymmetry in lower limbs. The discrepancies found in the literature might be due to variability in testing protocol and evaluated cohorts as well as the difference in training age (Lehance et al, 2009; Fousekis et al, 2010a) and playing position (Ruas et al, 2015; Sliwowski et al, 2017)
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have