Interlaboratory trial of short-chain chlorinated paraffin: comparison of mass fractions and homolog profiles in a simulation environmental sample.

Abstract

Short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) are listed in the Stockholm Convention. Therefore, selecting suitable methods for their accurate quantification is essential. Nowadays, the quality of commercial reagents employed as quantification standards is not guaranteed. As a solution, we adopted an SCCP formulation reference material with known homolog composition ratios as the quantification standard to evaluate the appropriateness of the methods. By mixing the SCCP formulation and interferences, an analytical sample was independently prepared and used as the simulation environmental sample. The homolog compositional profiles of the SCCPs resembled those of the quantification standard and the analytical sample. The mass fractions and the homolog profiles, including the carbon chain length and chlorine homologprofiles, of the SCCPs were reported by 14 different laboratories. For the mass fraction, the results reported by participants were consistent, except for the participants that employed low-resolution gas chromatography (GC). The results generated from liquid chromatography (LC) and GC were slightly different, despite of the similar homolog composition ratios between the quantification standard and the analytical sample. Although there were discreet discrepancies in the overall chlorine homolog profiles, the carbon chain length profiles acquired from GC and LC were similar. The differences depended on the method employed. Additionally, compared with the low-resolution data, the high-resolution data displayed less fluctuation since the effect of the interferences on the analytical sample was reduced because of the mass accuracy of high-resolution instruments. Accordingly, the interlaboratory trial employing the similar homolog compositional profiles of the quantification standard and the analytical sample proved valuable in elucidating the differences among methods, considering equipment, resolution specification, and ionization.