Abstract
Media censorship is prevalent in autocratic regimes, but little is known about how and why censorship might vary within a country. I collect close to 40,000 articles from Chinese newspapers about officials caught during Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption campaign, which is campaign widely publicised in the central state media. Yet, despite greater reader interest, local newspapers underreport corruption scandals involving high-level officials from their own province compared to officials from other provinces. Underreporting is greater when a newspaper does not rely on advertising revenue and a corrupt official is well connected. When newspapers do report high-level corruption at home, they deemphasise these stories, by making them shorter and featuring official sounding headlines without references to corruption or the anti-corruption campaign. City-level newspapers report less about corruption in their own city relative to other cities in the same province, but are more likely to report high-level corruption within the provincial government than provincial newspapers. These results suggest that intergovernmental conflict within an autocracy can lead to diverging media censorship strategies by different levels of government.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have