Abstract

The proceeding chapters have touched on several reasons why the GPA might have remained plurilateral, along with the associated, history of ongoing efforts to promote procurement reforms across different levels of government and governance. Many of the lessons to be derived from these activities suggest contradictory paths of action, or are at least difficult to reconcile, especially across levels of governance. For example, the IFIs’ early ‘liberal-rationalistic approaches’ to containing the problem of corruption — including but not limited to unethical conduct in public procurement — have proven some merit in terms of promoting more efficient use of public funds, but, by failing to address the social and historical contingency of the institutions and norms they seek to reform, may miss a deeper set of political challenges relating to the locus and legitimacy of authority in a given society (Bukovansky, 2006).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.