Abstract

Abstract. In May 2013, a massive ice jam on the Yukon River caused flooding that destroyed much of the infrastructure in the Interior Alaska village of Galena and forced the long-term evacuation of nearly 70% of its residents. This case study compares the communication efforts of the out-of-state emergency response agents with those of the Alaska River Watch program, a state-operated flood preparedness and community outreach initiative. For over 50 years, the River Watch program has been fostering long-lasting, open, and reciprocal communication with flood prone communities, as well as local emergency management and tribal officials. By taking into account cultural, ethnic, and socioeconomic features of rural Alaskan communities, the River Watch program was able to establish and maintain a sense of partnership and reliable communication patterns with communities at risk. As a result, officials and residents in these communities are open to information and guidance from the River Watch during the time of a flood, and thus are poised to take prompt actions. By informing communities of existing ice conditions and flood threats on a regular basis, the River Watch provides effective mitigation efforts in terms of ice jam flood effects reduction. Although other ice jam mitigation attempts had been made throughout US and Alaskan history, the majority proved to be futile and/or cost-ineffective. Galena, along with other rural riverine Alaskan communities, has to rely primarily on disaster response and recovery strategies to withstand the shock of disasters. Significant government funds are spent on these challenging efforts and these expenses might be reduced through an improved understanding of both the physical and climatological principals behind river ice breakup and risk mitigation. This study finds that long term dialogue is critical for effective disaster response and recovery during extreme hydrological events connected to changing climate, timing of river ice breakup, and flood occurrence in rural communities of the Far North.

Highlights

  • Global climate change has significant effects on Alaska and its residents, both positive and negative

  • The goal of this paper is to illustrate via a case study how the socioeconomic wellbeing in these communities could be improved through the development of effective hydrological hazard mitigation and disaster response strategies

  • According to Bieniek et al (2011), El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO)-related climate anomalies result in fewer storms in the Gulf of Alaska during the positive phase in springtime

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Global climate change has significant effects on Alaska and its residents, both positive and negative. Quickly thawing coastal permafrost causes collapse of the shoreline, forcing many indigenous people to relocate from their communities. The increasing loss of ice has been disrupting animal and fish migration patterns, and causing socioeconomic hardship in the region (Cozzetto et al, 2013; Moore and Huntington, 2008; West, 2011). Hydrological hazards became a bigger concern after the local population settled in permanent locations with life sustaining infrastructure and property. The goal of this paper is to illustrate via a case study how the socioeconomic wellbeing in these communities could be improved through the development of effective hydrological hazard mitigation and disaster response strategies. Appropriate policies, and effective communication should be incorporated into these interdisciplinary strategies

Background
Disaster response and recovery in Alaska: logistical and cultural challenges
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call