Abstract

The effects of two Bacillus strains ( Bacillus pumillus and B. licheniformis) on Medicago sativa plants were determined in single or dual inoculation with three arbuscular-mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and compared to P-fertilization. Shoot and root plant biomass, values of thymidine and leucine incorporation as well as ergosterol and chitin in rhizosphere soil were evaluated to estimate metabolic activity and fungal biomass, respectively, according to inoculation treatments. For most of the plant parameters determined, the effectiveness of AM fungal species was influenced by the bacterial strain associated. Dual inoculation of Bacillus spp. and AM fungi did not always significantly increase shoot biomass compared to single AM-colonized plants. The most efficient treatment in terms of dry matter production was the dual Glomus deserticola plus B. pumillus inoculation, which produced similar shoot biomass and longer roots than P-fertilization and a 715% (shoot) and 190% (root length) increase over uninoculated control. The mycorrhizas were more important for N use-efficiency than for P use-efficiency, which suggests a direct mycorrhizal effect on N nutrition not mediated by P uptake. Both chemical and biological treatments affected thymidine and leucine incorporation in the rhizosphere soil differently. Thymidine was greater in inoculated than in control rhizospheres and B. licheniformis was more effective than B. pumillus in increasing thymidine. Non-inoculated rhizospheres showed the lowest thymidine and leucine values, which shows that indigenous rhizosphere bacteria increased with introduced inocula. The highest thymidine and leucine values found in P-fertilized soils indicate that AM plants are better adapted to compete with saprophytic soil bacteria for nutrients than P-amended plants. Chitin was only increased by coinoculation of B. licheniformis and G. intraradices. B. pumillus increased ergosterol (indicative of active saprophyte fungal populations) in the rhizosphere of AM plants and particularly when colonized by G. mosseae. The different AM fungi have different effects on bacterial and/or fungal saprophytic populations and for each AM fungus, this effect was specifically stimulated or reduced by the same bacterium. This is an indication of ecological compatibilities between microorganisms. Particular Glomus–bacterium interactions (in terms of effect on plant growth responses or rhizosphere population) do not seem to be related to the percentage of AM colonization. The effect on plant growth and stimulation of rhizosphere populations, as a consequence of selected microbial groups, may be decisive for the plant establishment under limiting soil conditions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call