Abstract
Liquid waste was reduced by 52% when flow injection–direct injection nebulization (FI–DIN) was used in place of continuous pneumatic nebulization (CPN) for the analysis of hazardous and/or radioactive solutions by ICP-MS. The FI–DIN analyses were also 33% faster. Instrumental limits of detection obtained with FI–DIN and CPN were comparable for Cd, Pb, and U. Some statistically significant differences between FI–DIN and CPN determinations were observed, but only in the case of Ni were these differences attributed to the choice of nebulizer.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
