Flow injection analysis with inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy: critical comparison of conventional pneumatic, ultrasonic and direct injection nebulization

Abstract

The analytical figures of merit observed under flow injection analysis (FIA) conditions of a direct injection nebulizer (DIN) interfaced to an inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) facility were found to be comparable to or better than conventional pneumatic nebulization in terms of limits of detection, reproducibility and interelement effects. The DIN offered clog-free operation and part per billion limits of detection for 30μl sample injection volumes and carrier stream consumption rates in the range of 100–200μl min −1. The relative detection limits observed were generally comparable to those obtained for: (a) FIA introduction of 200μl or continuous sample introduction into a conventional cross flow nebulizer; and (b) FIA introduction of 500μl or continuous sample introduction into an ultrasonic nebulizer. Absolute and relative detection limits were comparable to or within the range of values reported for electrothermal vaporization-ICP-AES and comparable or superior to those reported for the graphite cup, direct insertion-ICP-AES. The reported absolute detection limits for the graphite-rod direct insertion approach ranged from comparable values to superior by a factor of 30. At the normal compromise observation height (20 mm), the interelement effects, to the extent they were observable, were comparable in magnitude for both the DIN and conventional cross-flow pneumatic nebulizer.