Abstract

Biobased production has been promoted as a sustainable alternative to fossil resources. However, controversies over its impact on sustainability highlight societal concerns, value tensions and uncertainties that have not been taken into account during its development. In this work, the consideration of stakeholders’ values in a biorefinery design project is investigated. Value sensitive design (VSD) is a promising approach to the design of technologies with consideration of stakeholders’ values, however, it is not directly applicable for complex systems like biorefineries. Therefore, some elements of VSD, such as the identification of relevant values and their connection to a technology’s features, are brought into biorefinery design practice. Midstream modulation (MM), an approach to promoting the consideration of societal aspects during research and development activities, is applied to promote reflection and value considerations during the design decision making. As result, it is shown that MM interventions during the design process led to new design alternatives in support of stakeholders' values, and allowed to recognize and respond to emerging value tensions within the scope of the project. In this way, the present work shows a novel approach for the technical investigation of VSD, especially for biorefineries. Also, based on this work it is argued that not only reflection, but also flexibility and openness are important for the application of VSD in the context of biorefinery design.

Highlights

  • It is more than a decade since controversies over the sustainability of biofuels began to surface (Rosegrant and Msangi 2014)

  • To bring reflection into biorefinery design practice, we looked at Midstream modulation (MM), a method that focuses on the practices of researchers and their decision making

  • We argue that bringing elements of Value sensitive design (VSD) into biorefinery design practice with flexibility, considering what is possible in the project, can serve to bring value considerations during their development

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is more than a decade since controversies over the sustainability of biofuels began to surface (Rosegrant and Msangi 2014) These controversies called attention to societal concerns, value tensions and uncertainties that had not been considered during the development of biobased production. These methods are typically closed to stakeholder participation and are often limited to issues that already drive biobased production, such as energy efficiency and the reduction of carbon emissions (Palmeros Parada et al 2017; Pfau et al 2014) This means that existing biorefinery design approaches rarely address societal concerns, value tensions and uncertainties related to the sustainability of biobased production. Decisions over a variable are made along iterative processes that include the generation and exploration of alternatives (e.g. calculations, simulations, experiments), and a final decision

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call