Abstract

A substantial proportion of patients receiving cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) do not achieve remission, and drop-out is considerable. Motivational interviewing (MI) may influence non-response and drop-out. Previous research shows that MI as a pre-treatment to CBT produces moderate effects compared with CBT alone. Studies integrating MI with CBT (MI-CBT) are scarce. To test the feasibility of MI-CBT in terms of therapist competence in MI and various participant measures, including recruitment and retention. In addition, separate preliminary evaluations were conducted, exploring the effects of CBT alone for anxiety disorders and depression, and of MI-CBT for anxiety disorders, depression and unhealthy lifestyle behaviours. Using a randomised controlled parallel trial design, participants were recruited in routine psychiatric care and allocated to CBT alone or MI-CBT. Means in feasibility measures and within-condition Hedges' g effect sizes in treatment outcome measures were calculated. Authors were not blind to treatment allocation, while independent raters were blind. Seventy-three patients were assessed for eligibility, and 49 were included. Participant perceptions of treatment credibility, expectancy for improvement, and working alliance were similar for both conditions. Overall, effect sizes were large across outcome measures for both conditions, including anxiety and depressive symptoms and functional impairment. However, therapists did not acquire sufficient competence in MI and the drop-out rate was high. MI-CBT proved feasible in some respects, but the present study did not support the progression to a randomised controlled trial designed to assess the effectiveness of MI-CBT. Additional pilot studies are needed.

Highlights

  • Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is probably an efficacious treatment for anxiety disorders and depression, taking into account publication bias, the quality of trials, and the influence of control conditions (Cuijpers et al, 2016)

  • Motivational interviewing (MI) has been employed as an adjunct to cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in several studies, and a recent meta-analysis including 12 studies of adult patients with anxiety disorders showed that the combination had a moderate effect on symptom reduction compared with CBT alone (Marker and Norton, 2018)

  • One explanation offered by the authors was that the dose or delivery of MI was sub-optimal, because an MI module was available for use if participants showed signs of decreased motivation only if standard CBT procedures for making participants adhere to treatment were ineffective (Simpson et al, 2010)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is probably an efficacious treatment for anxiety disorders and depression, taking into account publication bias, the quality of trials, and the influence of control conditions (Cuijpers et al, 2016). MI has been employed as an adjunct to CBT in several studies, and a recent meta-analysis including 12 studies of adult patients with anxiety disorders showed that the combination had a moderate effect on symptom reduction compared with CBT alone (Marker and Norton, 2018). In a wellcontrolled and adequately powered randomised trial, Westra and colleagues (Westra et al, 2016) found that at post-assessment there were no differences in outcomes in participants with generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) who were recruited from the general population and received CBT alone or MI-CBT.

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call