Abstract

Two approaches to ecological restoration planning, limiting-factors analysis and process-based restoration, are employed in efforts to recover endangered salmonid species throughout the Pacific Northwest of North America. Limiting-factors analysis seeks to identify physical limitations to fish production that may be addressed by habitat restoration; it is known as the “Field of Dreams” hypothesis (i.e., if you build it, they will come). Process-based restoration, in contrast, assumes that protection and/or restoration of watershed-scale processes will best achieve self-sustaining habitat features that support salmon populations. Two case studies from the Columbia River basin (northwestern USA) display current efforts to integrate these two restoration approaches to improve salmonid populations. Although these examples both identify site-specific habitat features to construct, they also recognize the importance of supporting key watershed processes to achieve restoration goals. The challenge in advancing the practice of restoration planning is not in simply acknowledging the conceptual benefits of process-based restoration while maintaining a traditional focus on enumerating site-specific conditions and identifying habitat-construction projects, but rather in following process-based guidance during recovery planning and, ultimately, through implementation of on-the-ground actions. We encourage a realignment of the restoration community to truly embrace a process-based, multi-scalar view of the riverine landscape.

Highlights

  • Effective planning and recovery of endangered species face multiple challenges

  • The second, “top-down” approach to aquatic restoration planning embraces the principles of process-based restoration [28,29]

  • Imposed geographical constraints or financial limitations may constrain the scope of imposed geographical constraints or financial limitations may constrain the scope meaningful analyses to support restoration planning, we believe that the legacy of traditional of meaningful analyses to support restoration planning, we believe that the legacy of traditional restoration practices presents a more serious limitation on achieving truly effective, science-based restoration practices presents a more serious limitation on achieving truly effective, science-based outcomes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Effective planning and recovery of endangered species face multiple challenges. After many decades of theory and practice in the pursuit of river restoration, we have come to recognize two broad approaches to restoration planning and implementation, fundamentally different in their perspectives and approaches, but commonly sharing the same ultimate goal, namely the recovery of endangered aquatic species across a human-disturbed landscape. Our objectives are to articulate the attributes of these two approaches, to explore how they can each support the other’s limitations, and to present two ongoing examples of salmonid recovery planning in the Pacific. Northwest of North America, where the challenges and the opportunities presented by integrating these perspectives are well-expressed

Limiting-Factors Analysis
Process-Based Restoration
Case Studies
Reach Assessment along the Methow River
Oblique
Example
The Atlas Prioritization Framework
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call