Abstract
Two approaches to ecological restoration planning, limiting-factors analysis and process-based restoration, are employed in efforts to recover endangered salmonid species throughout the Pacific Northwest of North America. Limiting-factors analysis seeks to identify physical limitations to fish production that may be addressed by habitat restoration; it is known as the “Field of Dreams” hypothesis (i.e., if you build it, they will come). Process-based restoration, in contrast, assumes that protection and/or restoration of watershed-scale processes will best achieve self-sustaining habitat features that support salmon populations. Two case studies from the Columbia River basin (northwestern USA) display current efforts to integrate these two restoration approaches to improve salmonid populations. Although these examples both identify site-specific habitat features to construct, they also recognize the importance of supporting key watershed processes to achieve restoration goals. The challenge in advancing the practice of restoration planning is not in simply acknowledging the conceptual benefits of process-based restoration while maintaining a traditional focus on enumerating site-specific conditions and identifying habitat-construction projects, but rather in following process-based guidance during recovery planning and, ultimately, through implementation of on-the-ground actions. We encourage a realignment of the restoration community to truly embrace a process-based, multi-scalar view of the riverine landscape.
Highlights
Effective planning and recovery of endangered species face multiple challenges
The second, “top-down” approach to aquatic restoration planning embraces the principles of process-based restoration [28,29]
Imposed geographical constraints or financial limitations may constrain the scope of imposed geographical constraints or financial limitations may constrain the scope meaningful analyses to support restoration planning, we believe that the legacy of traditional of meaningful analyses to support restoration planning, we believe that the legacy of traditional restoration practices presents a more serious limitation on achieving truly effective, science-based restoration practices presents a more serious limitation on achieving truly effective, science-based outcomes
Summary
Effective planning and recovery of endangered species face multiple challenges. After many decades of theory and practice in the pursuit of river restoration, we have come to recognize two broad approaches to restoration planning and implementation, fundamentally different in their perspectives and approaches, but commonly sharing the same ultimate goal, namely the recovery of endangered aquatic species across a human-disturbed landscape. Our objectives are to articulate the attributes of these two approaches, to explore how they can each support the other’s limitations, and to present two ongoing examples of salmonid recovery planning in the Pacific. Northwest of North America, where the challenges and the opportunities presented by integrating these perspectives are well-expressed
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.