Abstract

Transboundary environmental problems caused by urban expansion and economic growth cannot be solved by individual cities. Successful intercity environmental cooperation relies on the clear identification and definition of the rights and obligations of each city. An Ecosystem services (ES) approach not only budgets the ES supply and demand of a city, but also defines the spatial relationships between Services Provisioning Areas (SPA) and Services Benefiting Areas (SBA). However, to date, quantitative studies integrating ES budgets and spatial relations have been scarce. This study integrates ecosystem services supply–demand budgeting with flow direction analysis to identify intercity environmental cooperation in the highly urbanized Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region of China for water-related ecosystem services (flood protection, erosion regulation and water purification). The results demonstrated that there were significant spatial mismatches in the supply and demand of three water-related ES among 16 core cities in the YRD region: five to six cities in the southern part of the region had significant service surpluses, while ten to 11 cities in the north–central part had significant service deficits. We then went on to offer definitions for Ecosystem Services Surplus City, Ecosystem Services Deficit City and Ecosystem Services Balance City, as well as Service Provisioning City, Service Benefiting City and Service Connecting City in which to categorize cities in the YRD Region. Furthermore, we identified two intercity cooperation types and two non-cooperation types. This framework can be used to promote ecological integration in highly urbanized regions to advance sustainable development.

Highlights

  • Urban expansion and economic growth have caused serious transboundary environmental problems which have deeply undermined regional sustainable development [1,2,3]

  • For the Service Provisioning City (SPC)–Service Benefiting City (SBC) cooperation type, we suggest that the relevant cities should carry out payment of ecosystem services (PESs) mechanisms or eco-compensation mechanisms which are currently being tested in some cities such as Suzhou [80]

  • An Ecosystem services (ES) approach makes it possible to budget the ES supply and demand of a city, and define to the spatial relations of SPCs and SBCs in order to develop an effective tool for intercity cooperation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urban expansion and economic growth have caused serious transboundary environmental problems which have deeply undermined regional sustainable development [1,2,3]. ES supply and demand can be made spatially explicit by linking these factors to land cover [20,29,30], an approach adopted in a study of recreational service supply and demand for the Basque Country in Spain at the regional scale [31], and the study of ES matrixes and supply–demand ratios for the spatial–temporal analysis of the Taihu Lake Basin in China [32]. We present a general ES framework integrating an ES supply–demand budget with flow direction analysis, identifying ES city types and spatial relations for intercity environmental cooperation in a highly urbanized region

Framework
Identifying Transboundary Environmental Problems and Objectives
Analyzing Relationships Among These Problems and Their Relevant ES
Developing Intercity Environmental Cooperation
Study Area
Data Sources
Developing Intercity Environmental Cooperation Models
Implications for Intercity Environmental Cooperation
Findings
Contributions and Limitations
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call