Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the joint integration of production and 4-D inverted seismic data into reservoir models. These data correspond to different types and different scales. Therefore, we developed two-scale simulation workflows making it possible to incorporate data at the right scale. This issue also emphasized the need for adapting traditional history-matching methodologies. For instance, the formulation of the objective function and the development of customized parameterization techniques turned out to be two key factors controlling the efficiency of the matching process. Two application examples are presented. The first one is a small-size synthetic field case. It aims to build a set of reservoir models respecting either production data only or both production and 4-D seismic-related data. It is shown that the incorporation of 4-D seismic-related data in addition to production data into reservoir models contributes to reduce the uncertainty in production forecasts. The second example is a field in the North Sea offshore Norway operated by <i>Statoil<i/>. It stresses difficulties in conditioning reservoir models to both real production and 4-D inverted seismic data among the very large number of uncertain parameters to handle and the comparison of real noisy data with numerical responses.

Highlights

  • Reservoir heterogeneity exists at multiple scales and is related to complex and intricate geological formation processes such as bedform migration, erosion and deposition

  • The formulation of the objective function and the development of customized parameterization techniques turned out to be two key factors controlling the efficiency of the matching process

  • The first one, which refers to the synthetic PUNQ-S3 case, highlighted the added value of 4-D seismic data for improving the reliability of reservoir models and of the forecasts estimated from these models

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Reservoir heterogeneity exists at multiple scales and is related to complex and intricate geological formation processes such as bedform migration, erosion and deposition. A model is a numerical representation of the spatial variations in petrophysical properties inside a geological formation It consists of a three-dimensional grid populated with porosities, permeabilities, initial oil saturations, etc. The fine geological model is upscaled to the scale where data have to be incorporated This calls for accurate upscaling methods able to transfer physical processes and properties from one scale to another. Referring to multiscale modeling, Jenny et al (2006) developed a multiscale finite volume method for multiphase flow They used a sequential scheme for dealing separately and differently with pressure and saturation. They pointed out the accuracy and computational efficiency of the method compared to standard finite volume solutions of the fine-scale problem. This example focuses on the joint integration of production data and 4-D seismic impedances

SIMULATION WORKFLOWS
INVERSE PROBLEM
Objective Function
Parameterization
Optimization Workflow
APPLICATION CASES
Value of 4-D Seismic in Improving Forecasts
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call