Abstract

Supercritical fluids are increasingly being used and promoted at a laboratory and pilot scale to produce high value, natural bioactives from biologically based raw materials. Supercritical CO2 is overwhelmingly the solvent of choice for these operations, but is largely limited to the processing of dry raw materials and the extraction of low polarity, low molecular weight compounds. The use of co-solvents and the use of alternative ‘near-critical’ extraction fluids such as dimethyl ether show potential to mitigate these limitations. Commercialisation of new supercritical extraction processes has arguably been limited because the supercritical extraction process has been developed in isolation of other processing steps necessary to achieve a successful product. This study reviews recent developments in integrated processing that incorporate the use of supercritical fluids for bioseparations and in particular process schemes that produce high value natural bioactives. Integrated processes include prior operation (fermentation, extraction, enzyme pre-treatment, physical fractionation or size reduction) followed by supercritical extraction or fractionation and processes in which operations are carried out in situ in supercritical fluids (supercritical chromatography, enzymatic conversion, precipitation and coating of solutes). The use of co-solvents and alternative extraction solvents in these processes is discussed. Prospects for future developments are also discussed.

Highlights

  • Supercritical fluid extraction using CO2 is an established industrial process for the production of high value natural products

  • In this case biological materials are pre-processed by solvent extraction or physical separations to produce a partial concentration of desired product compounds, to remove compounds that may inhibit downstream processing, or to dry or mill material to a suitable form

  • Enzymatic pre-treatment to improve the yield of fucoxanthin from Undaria in an ethanol extraction process has been investigated (Sho and Sugiyama, 2010), but this has not been combined with supercritical fluid extraction

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In the case of DME it will extract polar lipids (Catchpole et al, 2008; 2009a; 2010) and to some extent water (Yano et al, 1978; Catchpole et al, 2007a; Pozo and Streett, 1984), making it a flexible solvent for many bioprocessing operations. Both propane and DME are suitable for food applications and are recognized as approved solvents for use in some countries including New Zealand and Australia. Near-critical fluids, has some similarities to use of supercritical fluid CO2, including low temperature operation, easy separation of solvent from product due to the large difference in volatility, high solvent recyclability and low solvent residues

The Need for Integrated Bioprocessing
Supercritical Fluid Systems for Integrated Bioprocessing
UPSTREAM FRACTIONATION OF
Hydroalcoholic Extraction of Plant Antioxidants
Supercritical Antisolvent Precipitation of Solutes
PUFA Concentration by Urea Complexing and Supercritical
Concentration and Extraction of Phospholipids from Dairy Streams
PRODUCTION OF BIOMASS BY MICRO-ORGANISMS
Dietary Applications
Biofuel Applications
Size Reduction
Enzymatic Pretreatment of Macroalgae
IN SITU PROCESSES
Supercritical Fluid Phase Chromatography
PUFA Enrichment by Selective Fatty Acid Esterification
Findings
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.