Integrated solid oxide fuel cell, solar PV, and battery storage system to achieve zero net energy residential nanogrid in California

Abstract

California is seeking to mandate Zero Net Energy (ZNE) buildings by 2030 as part of its efforts to combat climate change. A ZNE building is required to compensate its annual energy consumption from the grid (electricity or gas) by injecting clean electricity back to the grid. So far, the most common approach for a ZNE building is utilizing solar photovoltaic (PV) or a PV and battery energy storage system. One key problem is the feasibility of installing PV if the surface area requirement is too large to achieve ZNE; another issue is grid congestion during the off-peak hours of midday when a large number of houses export their excess solar power to the grid. Hence, other ZNE home scenarios need to be evaluated to tackle these restrictions in achieving California’s climate goals.In this work, we proposed and evaluated different system arrangements to reduce the required PV installation that is commonly installed as power generation source for ZNE residential units in California. The aim of this technical analysis is to provide a societal level policy guidance to accelerate fulfilling the ZNE home mandate. Due to the availability of the gas grid and potential for having more renewable gas in the grid, we investigated using gas-based heat generation versus only electric-based heat appliances. In addition, we incorporated a residential solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) on the building site as a micro combined heat and power (mCHP) to facilitate achieving ZNE. The impact and contributions of different components, including energy storage, on grid-dependence, and the overall energy demand are also studied. With analysis of different mix of technologies that could be used for a ZNE home, we propose the potential solutions and discuss their strengths and weakness.In this paper, energy performance and optimal PV capacity are assessed for a ZNE home in all 16 climate zones of California established by California Energy Commission (CEC). The ZNE measurements for all four scenarios are based on three metrics of energy evaluation: (1) site energy (energy measured by the meter used at the building site); (2) source energy (raw fuel consumption at the source of energy generation to account for energy loss in production and distribution); and (3) time dependent valuation (TDV) of energy, which has been developed by the CEC to comply with its building energy efficiency standards. The TDV of each energy type depends on the time of use, climate, grid constraints, and other factors that reflect its societal value at any given hour of the year. The PV size required by each ZNE metric is calculated and compared. The results proved that relying on some gas in addition to electricity improves the practicality of required PV for ZNE homes particularly in regions with high heating demands. It was found that depending on the energy metric (site, source, and TDV), a different arrangement is required for the most efficient ZNE performance. Unlike the site metric, using source and TDV metrics where electricity is more valuable than gas shows that having both gas and electricity significantly reduces the PV size. This encourages investment in introduction of more renewable gas in the grid as one possible solution to achieving ZNE in individual homes. The great impact of an mCHP SOFC on a ZNE home in terms of reliability and feasibility points to the need for research, development, and commercialization to reduce the cost of mCHP SOFCs in residential application. Also, the addition of a battery does not reduce the PV size with site and source metrics; it only reduces the electric grid reliance. However, with TDV, where the time of energy consumption affects its value, not only does it reduce grid reliance during peak hours, but also less PV is required to achieve ZNE.