Abstract

The environmental and biodiversity benefits of organic farming are widely recognized, but there is still controversy about the effects of organic production methods on the nutritional composition of food and human health. In the first part of this article therefore, we critically review the evidence that organic farming methods improve the nutritional quality of food crops. Moreover, we summarize our current understanding of how quality gains are linked to the implementation of the “innovations” introduced into conventional crop production during the intensification or “green revolution” of agriculture over the last 100 years. In the second part of the article, we critically review the evidence for the range of health benefits related to organic food consumption. Specifically, we describe and discuss the results from: (i) dietary intervention studies which have found that organic food consumption substantially reduces pesticide exposure in humans and affects feed intake, growth, hormone balances and immune system responsiveness in animal models; (ii) human cohort/epidemiological studies which have reported significant positive associations between organic food consumption and the lower incidence of a range of diseases including obesity, metabolic syndrome, cancer, hypospadias, pre-eclampsia, eczema and middle ear infections in infants; (iii) interactions and trade-offs between diet (e.g., whole-grain, fruit and vegetables and reduced red-meat consumption) and food types (organic versus conventional) concerning public health and future food security. The article also identifies knowledge gaps and highlights the need for (i) long-term, factorial field experiments to understand the relative effects of agronomic and pedoclimatic drivers on crop quality and safety, and (ii) clinical trials and additional human cohort studies to confirm the positive health outcomes linked to organic food consumption. The main conclusions from our review are that there is growing evidence that (i) agricultural intensification has resulted in a reduction in the nutritional quality of food and the sustainability of food production, and (ii) organic farming practices not only improve food quality and human health, but also food security. This is particularly true where current nutritional guidelines (increasing whole-grain, fruit and vegetable products, while reducing red-meat consumption) are implemented.

Highlights

  • Over the last 25 years, the demand for and production of organic food has increased rapidly globally [1]

  • NS, not significant; Main effect means of crop protection or fertilization treatments that resulted in significantly higher values are shown in bold; Crop Protection (CP), crop protection; CON, conventional crop protection based on synthetic chemical pesticides; ORG, organic crop protection based on mechanical weed control and hand weeding and the use of Cu-fungicides in potato only; 1 total hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives; 2 sum of hexanal, 3-butenenitrile, (E)-2-Hexenal and 2-propenyl isothiocyanate; 3 flavonoids

  • Results from the NFSC trials [58] demonstrated that it is not possible to make accurate conclusions regarding the effect of the production system and specific agronomic practices on crop quality parameters, unless the environmental variability is considered in the study design

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the last 25 years, the demand for and production of organic food has increased rapidly globally [1]. Organic farming regulations prohibit or restrict the use of many external inputs that are commonly used in conventional farming, primarily because they are (i) nonrenewable resources (e.g., mineral P, K and micronutrient fertilizers), (ii) energy intensive to produce (e.g., mineral N fertilizers, pesticides) and/or (iii) potentially deleterious to the environment and human health (e.g., mineral N and P fertilizers, synthetic chemical pesticides, antibiotics, food additives) [1,5,6]. Organic farming standards prescribe regular inputs of organic fertilizers (e.g., manure and composts) and the use of legume crops in rotation (to increase N-levels and balance N:P ratios in the soil). Sp4ecoiff4i-4 cally, this includes sections on: (i) crop rotation designs (Section 2.1); (ii) fertilization regimes (Section 2.2); (iii) crop protection (Section 2.3); (iv) crop breeding and selection (Sectthioeny2ie.4ld). gInapad[1d8i]t.ioItni,sSienctteiorenst2i.n5gdteoscnroibteesththateciumrpreanct corfocponyfieoludnsdiinngoregfafencictsfaorfmpeindgocalriesmimatiilcarbtaockcgornovuenndtioconnadl citrioopnsyoienldcsroinp Equaroliptye pinartahme e1t9e8r0sstoanedxp1l9a9in0st,hwe hcoensmidienrearballeNvaPrKfiearttiiolnizearnidnpsuotms ewtiemreeshicgohnefrl,icatnindgpreesstuiclitdserienppourtesdwienresatut dsimesilcaormlepvaerlisntgo thoesneucturritrieonntalyl ucsoemdpionscitoinonveonftoiorngalncicroapndprcoodnuvcetniotinoninalEcurrooppse. [22,23]

11 ENVIRONMENTAL fermentation extracts
Section 2.4.
Crop Rotation Design
Replacing Mineral N-Fertilizer with Organic Fertilizer Inputs
Replacing Superphosphate with Organic Fertilizer Inputs
Rhizobium and Mycorrhizal Fungal Inocula
Crop Protection
Environmental Enrichment Practices
Elicitors of Crop Resistance
Synthetic Chemical Pesticides That Are Prohibited in Organic Farming
Grapes
Butternut Squash
Effects of Organic Crop Consumption on Health Markers and Disease Incidence
Evidence from Animal Dietary Intervention Studies
Evidence from Human Dietary Intervention and Cohort Studies
Food Security
Conclusions
Agricultural Intensification Practices have Reduced Food Quality and Safety
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call