Abstract

Power systems face failures, attacks and natural disasters on a daily basis, making robustness and resilience an important topic. In an electrical network, robustness is a network’s ability to withstand and fully operate under the effects of failures, while resilience is the ability to rapidly recover from such disruptive events and adapt its structure to mitigate the impact of similar events in the future. This paper presents an integrated framework for jointly assessing these concepts using two complementary algorithms. The robustness model, which is based on a cascading failure algorithm, quantifies the degradation of the power network due to a cascading event, incorporating the circuit breaker protection mechanisms of the power lines. The resilience model is posed as a mixed-integer optimisation problem and uses the previous disintegration state to determine both the optimal dispatch and topology at each restoration stage. To demonstrate the applicability of the proposed framework, the IEEE 118-bus test network is used as a case study. Analyses of the impact of variations in both generation and load are provided for 10 simulation scenarios to illustrate different network operating conditions. The results indicate that a network’s recovery could be related to the overload capacity of the power lines. In other words, a power system with high overload capacity can withstand higher operational stresses, which is related to increased robustness and a faster recovery process.

Highlights

  • Critical infrastructure systems are integral to the everyday activities of modern life

  • The procedures are applied to scenarios of variation in generation and demand, the robustness and resilience models could be combined with other proposals to extend the results presented here

  • This paper proposes a joint framework for assessing both the robustness and resilience of electric power systems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Critical infrastructure systems are integral to the everyday activities of modern life Among these systems, power transmission networks are responsible for reliably and safely meeting power demands at different points in a power system. Power transmission networks are responsible for reliably and safely meeting power demands at different points in a power system In daily operation, these networks can experience attacks, failures, natural disasters, etc., all of which can severely degrade the entire function of the infrastructure [1]. Disruption is the phase experienced by the infrastructure immediately after a failure or high-impact, low-probability (HILP) event occurs and is followed by severe degradation of network function (tNO→tD) At this point, the load is only partially maintained (Pd).

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call