Abstract

We examine the contribution to labor productivity growth in the manufacturing sector of investment in different intangible asset categories—computerized information, innovative property, and economic competencies—for a set of 18 European countries between 1995 and 2017, as well as whether this contribution varies between different groups of countries. The motivation is to go a step further and identify which single or combination of intangible assets are relevant. The main findings can be summarized as follows. Firstly, all the three different categories of intangible assets contribute to labor productivity growth. In particular, intangible assets related to economic competences together with innovative property assets have been identified as the main drivers; specifically, advertising and marketing, organizational capital, research and development (R&D) investment, and design. Secondly, splitting the sample of European Union (EU) member states into three groups—northern, central and southern Europe—allows for the identification of a significant differentiated behavior between and within groups, in terms of the effects of investment in intangible assets on labor productivity growth. We conclude that measures promoting investment in intangibles at EU level should be accompanied by specific measures focusing on each country’s needs, for the purpose of promoting labor productivity growth. The obtained evidence suggests that the solution for the innovation deficit of some European economies consist not only of raising R&D expenditure, but also exploiting complementarities between different types of assets.

Highlights

  • In terms of investment per hour worked for the sample of countries considered in this study, these figures indicate that computerized information and innovative property represent a major part of investment in intangible assets

  • When introducing the variables one by one in order to identify those intangible assets that are significant for labor productivity growth, we find out an unexpected result, which is that investment in software has no significant influence

  • This study has explored the influence of different intangible assets’ investment on labor productivity growth, using international comparable panel data on the manufacturing industry for 18 European Union (EU) member states within a panel analysis between 1995 and 2017

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As Roth (2020) says, analysis in this field has been undertaken focusing on different aspects, such as individual or groups of countries, industry, firms, on complementary investments, among others. Research on this issue undertaken by Corrado et al (2005, 2006, 2009, 2013, 2017a, 2018) marks the beginning of a number of studies measuring intangible investment and showing the relevance of intangible capital for labor productivity growth. Similar studies have been conducted in Canada, (Muntean 2014), Japan (Fukao et al 2009), Australia (Barnes and McClure 2009) and Europe (Corrado et al.2013; Goodridge et al 2013; Roth and Thum 2013; Jona Lasinio et al 2011; Jalava et al.2007)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call