Abstract

The current stage of development of the domestic accounting system and accounting (financial) statements is characterized by a distortion of the essence of the social institution of accounting knowledge. The latter implies the existence and functioning of the two parity components — science as the evolving system of knowledge aimed at obtaining objectively structured and reasonable information about economic reality, as well as science as the sphere of activity of the professional economic community. Moreover, the first component, in accordance with the tenets of the science studies, is given the dominant, guiding role, which focuses the attention of practical activity on the goals and objectives of the society. Reforming accounting in accordance with international financial reporting standards led to the prevalence of the regulatory paradigm (practical component), which set a certain framework for the development of scientific thought, and in the future could lead to full discrimination of the social institution of accounting. The target setting of this article is aimed at identifying the underlying causes of the problems of institutionalization of the national accounting system. The substantiation of the author’s point of view required a system analysis of the results of scientific studies of sociology, philosophy and ethics of science, extrapolation of the knowledge gained to the object and subject of accounting. The formulation of conclusions predetermined the use of such general scientific research methods as observation, evaluation, deduction, and intellectual modeling. The results of the relevant studies actualize the need for large-scale research in the field of ethics of accounting science, as a primary element of the institutionalization process. The necessity for the development of academic ethics in accordance with the principle of mediated universalism is proved. The directions of development of accounting and accounting (financial) reporting are predicted — unipolarization, multi-polarization, non-polarization.

Highlights

  • Реформирование бухгалтерского учета в соответствии с международными стандартами финансовой отчетности привело к превалированию нормативной парадигмы, что поставило определенные рамки развитию научной мысли, а в перспективе может привести к полной дискриминации социального института бухгалтерского учета

  • Mislavskaya Financial University, Moscow, Russia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5366-3911 A B S TR A CT The current stage of development of the domestic accounting system and accounting statements is characterized by a distortion of the essence of the social institution of accounting knowledge

  • Reforming accounting in accordance with international financial reporting standards led to the prevalence of the regulatory paradigm, which set a certain framework for the development of scientific thought, and in the future could lead to full discrimination of the social institution of accounting

Read more

Summary

ОРИГИНАЛЬНАЯ СТАТЬЯ

А Н Н ОТА Ц И Я Современный этап развития отечественной системы бухгалтерского учета и бухгалтерской (финансовой) отчетности характеризуется искажением сути социального института учетного знания. Реформирование бухгалтерского учета в соответствии с международными стандартами финансовой отчетности привело к превалированию нормативной парадигмы (практической составляющей), что поставило определенные рамки развитию научной мысли, а в перспективе может привести к полной дискриминации социального института бухгалтерского учета. Обоснование авторской точки зрения потребовало проведения системного анализа результатов научных исследований социологии, философии и этики науки, экстраполяции полученного знания на объект и предмет бухгалтерского учета. Результаты соответствующих изысканий актуализируют необходимость проведения широкомасштабных исследований в сфере этики бухгалтерской науки как перво­ элемента процесса институционализации. Прогнозируются направления развития бухгалтерского учета и бухгалтерской (финансовой) отчетности — униполяризация, многополяризация, внеполяризация. Ключевые слова: институционализация; опосредованный универсализм; этика бухгалтерской науки; униполяризация; многополяризация; внеполяризация.

ORIGINAL PAPER
СПИСОК ИСТОЧНИКОВ
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.