Abstract

The paper studies the institutional influence of academics in Argentina within a context of increasing external control as a consequence of deep public reforms in the Higher Education system. Drawing on data from the Academic Profession in the Knowledge-Based Society (APIKS) survey, the aim is to analyse how much and in what sense the recent changes on the public policy level and the intermediate level of the state agencies have affected the academic profession in Argentina over teaching, research and social engagement activities, and its effects over the perception of institutional influence. Although we assume that academic power has been reduced within the new scenario, we believe that not all academics have responded in the same manner.

Highlights

  • The purpose of this article is to study the institutional influence of academics in Argentina within a context of increasing external control from the government over their academic activity

  • In this study we have studied the effects of changes in state-level public policies on the Argentinean academic profession

  • We conjectured that the shifts resulting in more external control over academic activity have impacted on the perception of institutional influence of academics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The purpose of this article is to study the institutional influence of academics in Argentina within a context of increasing external control from the government over their academic activity. The reforms have transformed the relation of universities to the state. The new agenda has created new rules to institutions and to academic work, based on quality assurance mechanisms and project-based or performance-based funding programmes. For these purposes, Argentina has followed similar trends of developed countries, with the creation of councils or agencies for competitive funding or for accreditation. Argentina has followed similar trends of developed countries, with the creation of councils or agencies for competitive funding or for accreditation These intermediate bodies between the state and institutions involve evaluation of academic activity with the participation of peer reviewers

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.