Abstract

The mechanical response of patterned graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) with a width less than 100 nm was studied in-situ using quantitative tensile testing in a transmission electron microscope (TEM). A high degree of crystallinity was confirmed for patterned nanoribbons before and after the in-situ experiment by selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns. However, the maximum local true strain of the nanoribbons was determined to be only about 3%. The simultaneously recorded low-loss electron energy loss spectrum (EELS) on the stretched nanoribbons did not reveal any bandgap opening. Density Functional Based Tight Binding (DFTB) simulation was conducted to predict a feasible bandgap opening as a function of width in GNRs at low strain. The bandgap of unstrained armchair graphene nanoribbons (AGNRs) vanished for a width of about 14.75 nm, and this critical width was reduced to 11.21 nm for a strain level of 2.2%. The measured low tensile failure strain may limit the practical capability of tuning the bandgap of patterned graphene nanostructures by strain engineering, and therefore, it should be considered in bandgap design for graphene-based electronic devices by strain engineering.

Highlights

  • Based Tight Binding (DFTB) simulation is conducted to predict a feasible bandgap opening as a function of width in graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) at low strain levels

  • Since the tail of the zero loss peak (ZLP) extends to more than 1 eV (Fig. S8), the extended tail of the ZLP would cover the signal of a bandgap in the spectrum even if a bandgap could be opened in the stretched GNRs according to refs 12 and 32

  • chemical vapor deposition (CVD) graphene was transferred to a PTP device for graphene stretching by the modified polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) transfer method, and it was successfully patterned into GNRs with widths less than 100 nm using a 200 keV focused electron beam in a transmission electron microscope (TEM)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Based Tight Binding (DFTB) simulation is conducted to predict a feasible bandgap opening as a function of width in GNRs at low strain levels. The graphene transferred on the PTP device was patterned into nanoribbons (Fig. 1d) by the focused electron beam in a Carl Zeiss LIBRA 200 MC Cs STEM tool at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV, using the Number Breaking strain (%) Dimensions (nm*nm) scanning beam in STEM mode.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.