Abstract
Today’s construction industry is overflowing with new ideas about its future. Off-Site Manufacture and Construction (OSCM) is at the heart of the modern construction industry. Much has been written about the state and context of OSCM in different countries regarding its perceived benefits and barriers to implementation. Off-site production (OSP) plays an important role in improving fragmented construction processes. Although most OSP research targets the attitudes and practices of OSP adoption, there is limited understanding of the philosophical issues underpinning OSP-related architecture. The roles of the architects’ personal philosophies are neglected and this hampers their implementation of OSCM (which has had a largely technical focus). This paper explores the traditional thinking patterns of architects in China and predicts possible future roles for them. It then conceptualizes an “architectural work” mode and a “building product” mode of design and construction and identifies the shortcomings of architects in an OSCM environment. The arguments made are based on practitioners’ perceptions and the first author’s practical experiences of leading several real-life projects in recent years. The findings reveal the implications and significance of the transformation from an “architectural work” mode to a “building product” mode. We foresee a study approach that focuses on the order and rules for OSCM, resulting in architects’ existing mindsets being changed to thinking patterns and design methodologies better suited to OSCM.
Highlights
Off-Site Manufacture and Construction (OSCM) has long been recognised, in China and internationally, for the potential and numerous benefits it provides
The findings reveal the implications and significance of the transformation from an “architectural work” mode to a “building product” mode
Our study has identified the traditional thinking patterns of architects in China and predicted possible future roles for them as seen through the lens of architects of their personal philosophies
Summary
Off-Site Manufacture and Construction (OSCM) has long been recognised, in China and internationally, for the potential and numerous benefits it provides. These investigations analysed and summarized the state and context of OSCM in different countries. Several research projects have been conducted to identify the factors that drove or constrained the uptake of OSP (e.g., Blismas et al, 2005; Bottom et al, 1994; Sparkman et al, 1999, Gibb, 2000; Fox, Marsh and Cockerham, 2001; Gibb and Isack, 2003; Housing Forum, 2002; Neale, Price and Sher, 1993)
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.