Abstract

Input-output (I-O) analysis has been widely used in embodied emission studies. For country-level analysis, the non-competitive imports assumption is generally preferred. However, national I-O tables with the non-competitive imports assumption are often not available. In empirical studies, the uniform imports share approach is usually adopted to give the estimated tables from the I-O tables with the competitive imports assumption. When data are available for two different years, structural decomposition analysis (SDA) can be applied to study the drivers of the embodied emission changes. We propose a SDA framework with two imports effects, i.e. input imports effect and demand imports effect, to evaluate the impacts of imports data treatment on the drivers. An empirical study using China's latest I-O datasets, for 2017 and 2018, show that the impacts are not significant at the national level but are significant at the sectoral level. For the latter, the impacts on sectoral embodied emission intensity range from −5% to 16%, while on sectoral embodied emissions range from −8% to 35%. Sectoral aggregate embodied intensity (AEI) indicators are found to be more robust to the imports data treatments than sectoral embodied emission intensity. In some cases a change in the sign of the input imports effect or demand imports effect is observed, which leads to opposite outcomes. Implications of the findings on embodied emission studies and the role of imports are discussed.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.