Abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate secondary caries inhibition after dentine pre-treatment with 2% CHX, experimental addition of CHX in primer and adhesive of a 3-step adhesive system, and industrial addition od CHX in a 2-step adhesive system. Materials and methodSixty Class-V cavities were restored according to the adhesive protocol (n=12): 1) control group, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, 3M (CTRL), 2) 2% CHX dentine pre-treatment (DENT), 3) 0.1% CHX in primer (PRIM), 4) 0.1% CHX in bonding agent (BOND), 5) Peak Universal Bond including 0.2% CHX (PEAK). Specimens were thermocycled (10,000 cycles) and inserted into a Streptococcus mutans biofilm artificial mouth (caries model). The 10-day biological loading protocol consisted of consecutive phases of demineralisation (1h) and remineralisation (5h). Evaluation under a fluorescence microscope (demineralisation) and an SEM (marginal gap) followed, at restoration margins, and at 0.3mm and 0.5mm distance from the margins, in enamel and in dentine. Total demineralization was calculated as the sum of demineralisation and substance loss due to demineralisation. ResultsPRIM (p=0.007, mod. LSD), BOND (p=0.012, mod. LSD) and PEAK (p=0.008, mod. LSD) exhibited significantly higher total demineralisation values in enamel margins than CTRL. No significant differences were noted for total demineralisation in dentine. Regarding marginal gaps, DENT exhibited significantly lower enamel gap values compared to all other groups (p=0.001). Conclusions2% CHX as dentine pre-treatment, 0.1% or 0.2% CHX added in adhesives did not provide any antibacterial effect regarding secondary caries in dentine. On the other hand, 2% CHX dentine pre-treatment managed to limit marginal gap formation in enamel compared to the other adhesive protocols in the study.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call