Abstract

While the United States has not established federal regulations for greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets, many US states have adopted their own standards and guidelines. In this study we examine state adoption of targets for GHG reductions during the ten-year period of 1998-2008, and identify factors that explain variation in target adoption. Potential influences are drawn from research from the public policy formulation and diffusion literature, and from studies specific to climate policy adoption. Potential influences on GHG reduction efforts among US states include socioeconomic attributes of residents, political and ideological orientations of citizens and state government, interest group activities, environmental pressures, and proximity to other states that have adopted GHG reduction targets. The findings of the multinomial logistic regression analysis indicate that states are more likely to adopt GHG reduction targets if they share a border with another state with a similar climate program and if their citizens are more ideologically liberal. Other factors including socioeconomic resources and interest group activities were not found to be associated with policy adoption. The findings yield insights into the conditions under which states are more likely to take action to reduce GHG's, and are relevant both to state policy makers and residents with an interest in climate planning, and for researchers attempting to estimate future greenhouse gas reduction scenarios.

Highlights

  • The 1997 Kyoto Protocol was not ratified by the US Senate and, to date, no federal targets for greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions have been set

  • The 17 states with GHG reduction targets are listed in alphabetical order: Arizona, California, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington

  • The logistic model yielded several interesting results concerning the relative associations between the independent variables and states’ adoption of the GHG reduction targets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The 1997 Kyoto Protocol was not ratified by the US Senate and, to date, no federal targets for greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions have been set. The future benefits to be gained through mitigation programs are difficult to quantify fully, while the present-day costs of some of the options, including implementing specific GHG reduction targets, are easier to determine In this context, it can be hard to summon the political will necessary to address climate change mitigation, especially given the existence of other compelling public problems competing for limited public resources. Consideration of problems and associated damages likely to occur more than four years in the future tend to be differed to later administrations, while more pressing issues are considered and acted upon in the present (Vig & Kraft, 2010) Given these challenges and disincentives, why have some US states taken steps to address climate change while others have not? Our central research objective is to identify key factors that may explain variation in state officials’ decisions to adopt state-level GHG reduction targets

Related Research
Research Questions
Data and Methods
Results and Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call