Influences of the limbic system on hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system

Abstract

(1) Effects of stimulations of various limbic structures (the olfactory bulb, olfactory tubercle, prepyriform cortex, endopyriform nucleus and various parts of amygdaloid nuclei) on the neurosecretory neurons in the supraoptic (SON) and paraventricular nuclei (PVN) of the hypothalamus were studied. All regions stimulated received strong inputs from the olfactory bulb. (2) Out of 195 ‘identified’ neurosecretory neurons tested one-half or more (49–74%, depending on the structures stimulated) were inhibited by stimuli consisting of 1–3 short pulses. The inhibition occurred immediately after the stimulus in approximately one-fifth of all inhibited neurons, in the remaining four-fifths inhibition occurred after more than 20 ms latency. Inhibition of neurosecretory neuron activity lasted for several hundred milliseconds, often followed by clear post-inhibitory excitation or rebound. (3) In 23 neurons, a distinct ‘evoked’ response of brief duration occurred with a 30 ms latency following stimulation of the lateral and medial amygdala, olfactory tubercle and prepyriform cortex. In another 17 neurons, a general increase in background activity with a longer latency (50–100 ms) occurred following stimulation of nearly all amygdaloid nuclei, olfactory tubercle and the pyriform cortex: lateral amygdala stimulation caused an excitation of the largest proportion of neurosecretory cells (30%) while none was excited by stimulation of the olfactory bulb and endopyriform cortex, except those occurring as post-inhibitory excitation. (4) There was a convergence of afferent impulses on single neurosecretory cells. A large proportion (42%) of the neurons received inputs from 2 to 4 limbic regions. (5) Neurosecretory cells which were influenced by limbic stimuli were also inhibited by baroreceptor activation and excited by osmotic stimulation. ‘Unidentified’ neurons within SON and PVN and ‘atypical neurosecretory cells’ (those responding to pituitary stalk stimulation with varying latencies) were also affected by the forebrain stimulation; some of these were also affected by an osmotic stimulus. A part of this group may send their axons to the median eminence.