Abstract
ABSTRACTA performance comparison among three types of styrene butadiene rubber (SBR), that is, emulsion polymerized SBR (ESBR), solution polymerized SBR (SSBR), and functionalized solution polymerized SBR (F-SSBR), was of interest. Effect of silica type, that is, highly dispersible silica and conventional precipitated silica, was also investigated. It is found that SSBR demonstrates significantly better heat build-up, dynamic set, abrasion resistance, including wet grip (WG) with comparable fuel efficiency, as compared to ESBR. As expected, the best tire performance, that is, abrasion resistance, WG, and fuel efficiency, is found in F-SSBR vulcanizates, attributed mainly to the greatest improvement in magnitude of rubber–filler interaction and degree of filler dispersion. Results reveal that the reactive functional group, that is, propylaminedimethoxysilane, which is chemically anchored at chain ends of F-SSBR, plays a crucial role in tire performance. Unexpectedly, silica type does not significantly influence the degree of filler dispersion, including WG and fuel saving efficiency. Probably, the predominance of sufficiently long mixing time during the compound preparation step may be responsible, as compared to the effect of silica characteristics.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
