Abstract
The authors have brought to our attention the following revisions for the article listed above, published in J Biomed Mater Res 2008; 84A: 557–566. Under RESULTS, Histological analysis of the grated tube substance and isofraft, third paragraph, the first sentence has been restated as: The number of blood vessels in both bilayered tubes (p < 0.01) and the chitosan nano/microfiber mesh tube with a DAc of 93% (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01) was significantly larger than those in the other groups (Table II). Table II has been resubmitted and replaces the previous version: We regret any confusion caused by these errors.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
