Influences of anatomical location and muscle quality on porcine lipid composition

Abstract

Carcasses of sixty Lacombe and Lacombe cross swine fed the same high concentrate ration were selected to equally represent three muscle quality groups (pale soft exudative (PSE), normal and dark firm dry (DFD)). These carcasses were utilised to supply back and belly fat samples for the evaluation of the influences of muscle quality and anatomical location on fatty acid composition. Back fat samples had lower percentages of palmitic (C16:0) and stearic (C18:0) acids, long (≥ C18), and short (≤ C16) chain saturated fatty acids and total saturated fatty acids and higher percentages of oleic (C18:1) and linoleic (C18:2) acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids and total unsaturated fatty acids than belly fat samples. They also had a higher unsaturated fatty acid to saturated fatty acid ratio than belly fat samples. Carcasses with DFD hams and loins had lower percentages of palmitoleic (C16:1) and linoleic (C18:2) acids and polyunsaturated fatty acids in their back fat than those with PSE hams and loins. They also had higher ( P < 0·05) percentages of myristic (C14: 0) and stearic (C18:0) acids and long chain saturated fatty acids (≥ C18) and lower percentages ( P < 0·05) of palmitic (C16:0) and palmitoleic (C16:1) acids in their back fat than carcasses with normal hams and loins. Moreover, they had lower ( P < 0·05) percentages of palmitoleic (C16:1) and linoleic (C18:2) acids and poly-unsaturated fatty acids in their belly fat than carcasses with normal and PSE hams and loins. The fact that the lipid composition of carcasses differed significantly among muscle quality groups is of considerable importance, since it implies that factors (stress) producing differences in muscle quality may also significantly influence the fatty acid composition—and thereby the physical properties of carcass lipids.