Abstract

The type of plantar footprint is different between athletes and non‐athletes [ Techakampuch and Donphongam, 2004]. Our research aimed to characterize the plantar footprint in athletes from different disciplines. The sample size was determined for a finite universe, the participants were both sexes: 326 athletes from 11 disciplines of the Peruvian Sports Institute (IPD) ‐ Trujillo Subsidiary and 80 non‐athletes. We print the plantar footprint, then measure the width of the metatarsal (X) and the distance between the arches (Y), then calculate using the formula IHC = ((XY)/X) 100. According to the value, IHC obtained the classification of the type of foot (flat foot = 0–34, normal flat = 35–39, normal = 40–54, normal cavus = 55–59, cavus = 60–74, strong cavus = 75–84, extreme cavus = 85–100) [ Hernández Corvo, 1987]. Athletes show ~58% of both feet with the same plantar footprint and ~42% of both feet with the different plantar footprint, instead; non‐athletes had ~88% and ~12% respectively. The predominant types of plantar footprint in athletes are ~ 38% normal, ~ 10% normal cavus and ~ 6% cavus. Although a type of foot modified to sport or discipline cannot be affirmed, we know that the constant physical and sports activity generates different modifications in the plantar footprint of players depending on the discipline practiced. These modifications are due to the technique being different in each of the disciplines [ Berdejo‐del‐Fresno et al., 2013]. We found that the type of sport influenced the anthropometric characteristic of the plantar footprint in the athletes of the IPD ‐ Trujillo Subsidiary, that is, the foot adapts to the demands of the sport.Support or Funding InformationAntenor Orrego Private UniversityHernández Corvo index (IHC). Adapted from Sánchez. 2017Figure 1 Percentage Distribution of the Plantar Footprint Influenced by the Type of Sport, Peruvian Sports Institute ‐ Trujillo Subsidiary Sports Plantar Footprint N° Flat (F) Normal Flat (NF) Normal (N) Normal Cavus (NC) Cavus (C) Strong Cavus (SC) Extreme Cavus (EC) Both Feet Equal N NC C N NC NF N F SC C Both Feet Different NC C NC C N N F N C NF Karate 34 00.0 00.0 47.6 05.9 08.8 00.0 00.0 62.0 00.0 11.8 00.0 02.9 14.7 00.0 00.0 05.9 00.0 02.9 38.0 Volleyball 38 00.0 00.0 31.6 26.3 05.3 00.0 00.0 63.0 05.3 15.7 10.5 00.0 00.0 00.0 05.3 00.0 00.0 00.0 37.0 Soccer 30 00.0 06.7 46.7 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 53.0 13.3 06.7 13.2 00.0 00.0 06.7 00.0 00.0 06.7 00.0 47.0 Baseball 32 00.0 00.0 37.5 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 37.5 12.5 12.5 00.0 12.5 00.0 12.5 00.0 12.5 00.0 00.0 62.5 Taekwondo 36 00.0 00.0 38.9 16.7 05.6 00.0 00.0 61.1 11.0 5.6 16.6 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 05.6 38.9 Athletics 34 00.0 00.0 50.0 10.5 04.5 00.0 00.0 65.5 05.5 05.0 06.5 01.5 14.9 01.1 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 34.5 Basketball 38 00.0 00.0 15.0 12.0 25.5 02.5 00.0 55.0 10.5 15.5 06.5 02.5 03.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 05.5 01.5 45.0 Gymnastics 40 00.0 00.0 50.2 13.8 08.5 02.0 01.0 75.5 10.3 06.7 02.5 00.0 01.5 01.0 01.0 00.0 01.5 00.0 24.5 Swimming 22 07.9 10.1 23.0 08.0 02.0 01.6 01.4 54.0 03.5 03.5 05.9 00.0 02.5 14.3 10.1 01.0 04.7 00.5 46.0 Rugby 12 00.0 03.5 33.9 05.1 05.5 00.0 00.0 48.0 15.9 10.1 06.5 03.0 01.0 04.0 07.0 02.0 02.5 00.0 52.0 Powerlifting 12 02.8 8.2 39.00 10.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 60.0 10.9 07.1 01.5 00.0 01.9 04.2 08.5 05.9 00.0 00.0 40.0 Total 326 0.97 2.59 37.58 9.85 5.97 0.55 0.22 57,69 8.97 9.11 6.34 2.04 3.59 3.98 2.9 2.48 1.9 0.95 42.31 Average 3.56 47.43 6.74 30.05 9.36 2.85 Non‐Athletes 80 12.5 5.0 25.0 20.0 25.0 3.8 0 87.5 0 0 0 0 3.8 0 0 1.1 3.8 0 12.5 Average 17.5 45 28.8 3.8 1.1 3.8

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.