Abstract

This study aimed to analyse the influence of the FIFA Quality PRO certification of artificial turf pitches on the physical, physiological performance and muscle damage in soccer players. Fifteen healthy male players (21.2 ± 1.4 years; 178.2 ± 4.3 cm; 79.1 ± 8.3 kg) from a university football team were selected to participate in the research. Mechanical properties related to surface–player interaction were assessed on the two surfaces selected for this study. A randomized design was used and the players performed the Ball-sport Endurance and Sprint Test (BEAST90) on the different artificial turf fields. Average time of the 20 m sprints was longer on the FIFA Quality Pro surface than on the non-certified pitch (+ 0.13 s; p < 0.05; CI 95% − 0.01 to 0.27; ES: 0.305). The players’ perceived effort was higher in the first (+ 2.64; p < 0.05; CI 95% 0.92 to 4.35; ES: 1.421) and the second half (+ 1.35; p < 0.05; CI 95% − 0.02 to 2.72; ES: 0.637) of the test on the FIFA Quality Pro field. Comparative analysis between surfaces showed no significant differences in the time spent in each of the heart rate zones and higher concentrations of CK (+ 196.58; p > 0.05; CI 95% 66.54 to 326.61; ES: 1.645) were evidenced in the non-certified pitch surface. In response to a simulated match protocol, markers of post-exercise muscle damage may be reduced on accredited artificial turf fields. These insights can provide the opportunity to maximize the efficiency of training sessions and reduce the risk of injury during the season.

Highlights

  • Football is experienced by actions of great intensity such as jumps, changes of direction, accelerations, decelerations and sprints along with moments of ­recovery[1,2]

  • The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of the FIFA Quality PRO certification of artificial grass pitches on the physical and physiological performance and muscle damage in football players

  • Results reveal a significant reduction in the sprint time of 12 m in the second half of the test compared to the first half in the FIFA Quality Pro certification field (− 0.08 s; CI 95% − 0.14 to 0.02; ES: 0.489)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Football is experienced by actions of great intensity such as jumps, changes of direction, accelerations, decelerations and sprints along with moments of ­recovery[1,2]. Andersson, Ekblom and K­ rustrup[10] analysed the impact of these two surfaces on movement patterns in total distance (10.19 km, s = 0.19 vs 10.33 km, s = 0.23), high-intensity running (1.86 km, s = 0.10 vs 1.87 km, s = 0.14), number of sprints (21, s = 1 vs 22, s = 2), both p < 0.05 on artificial turf than natural grass Another line of research has been related to the lifecycle of the artificial turf, in order to control the variables that ensure the maximum durability of the surface. Previous ­investigations[14] noted the significant differences between the different types of surface in their mechanical properties, focusing mainly on the support structure (sub-base and elastic layer) In this sense, it is very important to consider that the development and evolution of safe and quality artificial turf systems guarantee substantial savings in water consumption. The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of the FIFA Quality PRO certification of artificial grass pitches on the physical and physiological performance and muscle damage in football players

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call